Capacity Building Toward Global Competitiveness

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31580/jmi.v5i3.81

Keywords:

Capacity Building, Global Competitiveness, Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, Continuous

Abstract

The research is to know the increasing level of continuous capacity of Higher Education from every level of organization, system and individual level. Every organization and institution including Wijaya Kusuma University Surabaya is building capacity to achieve the vision that has been formulated in its Renstra document. The focus under study is which emphasizes the principles of good university governance that provide satisfaction guarantee to stakeholders. At the individual level, on improving the capacity and performance of lecturers in implementing “Tri Dharma Higher Educationâ€. The method uses a qualitative approach, with the research object of UWKS in Surabaya. Data validity using triangulation model. The results; the average score of Organization Level is 5.42, shows that capacity building at the organizational level has adequate adequacy as expected, Increased the capacity of individual level in terms of standard of Educator and Education Personnel with an average score of 5.08. Overall average system-level score of 3.16., where the score at this level indicates that capacity-level increase capacity has an insufficient tendency. The conclusion is the need for minor improvements that will make the grain capacity of the system level sufficient so there must be an emphasis on quality improvement to improve the capacity.

Author Biographies

  • Lusy Tunik Muharlisiani, Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya
    English Department
  • Heni - Sukrisno, Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya
    Fakultas Bahasa dan Sains

References

Alsa, Asmadi. (2007), Quantitative and Qualitative Approach and Its Combinations in Psychology Research, Yogyakarta: Student Literature.

Bungin, Burhan (2003), Qualitative Research Data Analysis, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Cleveland, Gary. (1998). Digital Libraries: Definitions, Issues, and Challenges. Occasional Paper 8. Ottawa: Universal Dataflow and Telecommunications Core Program, International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). Available at http://www.ifla.org/udt/op/ accessed on January 5, 2007.

Hadi, Amirul, & Haryono (2005), Educational Research Methodology, Bandung: CV. Faithful Library.

Harter, Stephen P. (1996). What is a Digital Library? Definitions, Content, and Issues: a paper presented at KOLISS DL 96: International Conference on Digital Libraries and Information Services for the 21st Century, September 10-13, 1996. Seoul, Korea. Available at http://php.indiana.edu/%7Eharter/korea-paper.html

Iskandar W., Adiwalujo D. (2016), Qualitative Research Method, Unesa University Press, Surabaya.

Leiner, Barry M. (1998). The Scope of the Digital Library: draft prepared for the Dlib Working Group on Library Metrics January 16, 1998. Revised October 15, 1998. Available at http://www.dlib.org/metrics/public/papers/dig-lib-scope.html

Limb, Peter. (2004). Digital Dilemmas and Solutions. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

Moleong, Lexy J. (2009), Qualitative Research Methodology, Bandung: PT. Youth Rosdakarya.

Strauss, Anselm & Corbin, Juliet. (2007), Basics of Qualitative Research, Yogyakarta: Student Literature.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-04

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Capacity Building Toward Global Competitiveness. (2018). Journal of Management Info, 5(3), 8-11. https://doi.org/10.31580/jmi.v5i3.81

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

21-30 of 30

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.