Development and validation of headteachers' leadership behavior questionnaire (HLBQ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31580/jmi.v9i2.2656Keywords:
Headteacher, Validation, Leadership BehaviorAbstract
The leadership behavior of the headteachers is associated with institutional worth. This study intended to develop and validate a headteachers’ leadership behavior questionnaire (HLBQ) to measure the leadership behavior of headteachers. The questionnaire encompassed two sub-dimensions viz: people-oriented leadership behavior and task-oriented leadership behavior as per Blake and Mouton’s Managerial Grid. After a rigorous literature review followed by focus group discussions, the preliminary draft of the tool encompassed forty-three (43) items on the five (5) points Likert Scale. Based on the content and face validity, the items with CVR values less than 0.42 were dropped. The revised questionnaire was pilot tested on three hundred and ten (310) public secondary school teachers employed in the school education department. The data were processed through Smart PLS version 4, which provided the questionnaire’s validity, reliability, and model fit. After deleting the unfit items, the questionnaire was further reduced to thirty-one (31) items. AVE values of the items related to people-oriented leadership behavior were 0.658 > 0.5, and for task-oriented were 0.686 > 0.5. Fornell-Lacker criterion value (0.828) was more than the correlations with other latent constructs, i.e., 0.811 and 0.831. The Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio (HTMT) value was 0.859 < 0.9, which is acceptable. Cronbach alpha for people-oriented leadership behavior was 0.967 > 0.7, and task-oriented leadership behavior was 0.658 > 0.7. Similarly, the composite reliability (CR) values for people-oriented leadership behavior were 0.970 > 0.7, and task-oriented leadership behavior was 0.963 > 0.7. Thus, the headteachers’ leadership behavior questionnaire (HTLB) was internally consistent, valid, and reliable. The findings of the entire study supported using the headteachers’ leadership behavior questionnaire (HLBQ) to explore and measure the leadership behavior of the headteachers.
References
Afthanorhan, A., Ghazali, P. L., & Rashid, N. (2021, May). Discriminant validity: a comparison of CBSEM and consistent PLS using Fornell & Larcker and HTMT approaches. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1874, No. 1, p. 012085). IOP Publishing.
Ali, M. S., Arshad, M., & Rasool, S. (2019). Effective management of secondary school headteachers in Punjab: A comparative study. Global Regional Review, 4(3), 136-144.
Alsaleh, A. A. (2021). The roles of school principals and headteachers in mitigating potential learning loss in the online setting: calls for change. International Journal of Educational Management.
Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of the transformational leadership and work motivation on teachers performance. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7), 19-29.
Armstrong, M. (2006). A handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers.
Atta-Asiedu, K. A. (2020). Understanding Measurement as a Tool in Social Research. Available at SSRN 3643797.
Balbuena, S. E., Perez, J. E. M., Irudayaselvam, S., & Balaccua, M. M. (2020). Application of Leadership Theories in Analyzing the Effects of Leadership Styles on Productivity in Philippine Higher Education Institutions. Online Submission, 8(3), 53-62.
Baptiste, M. (2019). No Teacher Left Behind: The Impact of Principal Leadership Styles on Teacher Job Satisfaction and Student Success. Journal of International education and leadership, 9(1), n1.
Bashir, I., Rana, R. A., Naseem, A., Ghafoor, A., & Mumtaz, B. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Situational and Style Leadership Theories. Competitive Education Research Journal, 3(1), 127-134.
Boudreau, M. C., Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2001). Validation in information systems research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS quarterly, 1-16.
Bush, T., & Ng, A. Y. M. (2019). Distributed Leadership and the Malaysia Education Blueprint: From prescription to partial school-based enactment in a highly centralised context. Journal of educational administration.
Choudrie, J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2005). Investigating broadband diffusion in the household: towards content validity and pre-test of the survey instrument.
Davidson, R. J. (2004). Well–being and affective style: neural substrates and biobehavioural correlates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1395-1411.
Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational administration quarterly, 52(2), 221-258.
Godwin, M., & Kabeta, R. M. (2019). The Effects of Headteachers’ Leadership Styles on the Teacher Performance in Selected Mission and Public Secondary Schools of Muchinga Province-Zambia. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 6(9), 158-165.
Kennedy, L. G., Kichler, E. J., Seabrook, J. A., Matthews, J. I., & Dworatzek, P. D. (2019). Validity and reliability of a food skills questionnaire. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 51(7), 857-864.
Khurram, A. F. A., Islam, M. U., & Bilal, A. (2020). Development and Validation of Prospective Teachers’ Metacognitive Abilities Questionnaire (PTMAQ). Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(2), 129-144.
Lawshe, C. H. (1969). Statistical theory and practice in applied psychology. Personnel Psychology.
Leonard, S., Obetta, I. E. J., & Adama, H. A. (2019). Management of instructional supervision and staff welfare in primary schools in kogi east education zone of kogi state. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science, 172-185.
Lewis, B. R., Templeton, G. F., & Byrd, T. A. (2005). A methodology for construct development in MIS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(4), 388-400.
Liljenberg, M. (2021). A professional development practice to enhance principals’ instructional leadership–enabling and constraining arrangements. Journal of professional capital and community.
Lopez-Odar, D., Alvarez-Risco, A., Vara-Horna, A., Chafloque-Cespedes, R., & Sekar, M. C. (2019). Validity and reliability of the questionnaire that evaluates factors associated with perceived environmental behavior and perceived ecological purchasing behavior in Peruvian consumers. Social Responsibility Journal.
Nilsa, V. P., & Anitha, S. (2019). The views of college students on teacher’s leadership styles. IJRAR-International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), 6(2), 586-590.
Oluwatayo, J. A. (2012). Validity and reliability issues in educational research. Journal of educational and social research, 2(2), 391-391.
Pont, B. (2020). A literature review of school leadership policy reforms. European Journal of Education, 55(2), 154-168.
Razak, A., Sarpan, S., & Ramlan, R. (2018). Effect of leadership style, motivation and work discipline on employee performance in PT. ABC Makassar. International Review of Management and Marketing, 8(6), 67.
Rostini, D., Syam, R. Z. A., & Achmad, W. (2022). The Significance of Principal Management on Teacher Performance and Quality of Learning. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2).
Salas‐Vallina, A., Alegre, J., & López‐Cabrales, Á. (2021). The challenge of increasing employees’ well‐being and performance: How human resource management practices and engaging leadership work together toward reaching this goal. Human Resource Management, 60(3), 333-347.
Squires, V. (2018). Northouse, PG (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pages: 494. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, (185).
Straub, D., Boudreau, M. C., & Gefen, D. (2004). Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information systems, 13(1), 24.
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in research. How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in research (August 10, 2016).
Tentama, F., & Nabilah, B. R. (2020). Construct Validity of Employability: Confirmatory Factor Analysis of The Employability Scale. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research Volume 9, Issue 02.
Unal, M. (2014). Importance of Change and Leadership in the 21st Century. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 3(9).
Wang, S., Shi, G., Lu, M., Lin, R., & Yang, J. (2021). Determinants of active online learning in the smart learning Environment: an empirical study with PLS-SEM. Sustainability, 13(17), 9923.
Yasir, G. M., Hussain, Z., & Khosa, I. A. (2022). Investigating Modality in Kamila Shamsie’s Burnt Shadows and Charles Dicken’s A Tale of Two Cities: A Corpus Driven Comparative Analysis. Competitive Education Research Journal, 3(1), 16-29. Retrieved from http://cerjournal.com/index.php/cerjournal/article/view/20
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Management Info
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
