Implementation of Non-Refoulement & Economic Burden Sharing in New World Order Under International Refugee Laws
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31580/jpvai.v5i1.2480Keywords:
International Law, Human Rights, Refugees, Burden Sharing, Non-Refoulment, Economic Prosperity, Financial BurdenAbstract
The increasing number of refugees is becoming a financial burden for the host countries. It impacts their economic prosperity and creates extra pressure to meet international regulations. This study describes how the doctrine of non-refoulment and burden sharing works in international refugee law to ensure the protection of all refugees. It discusses the rights of accommodation, education, food, protection, and all other economic rights within host countries. It also highlights the presence of proportionate refugee placement in various states and assesses the economic and social consequences of relocating refugees to host countries under international law. The recommendations of the study help to defend refugees from various other human rights violations and improve the burden-sharing process through the operationalization of international refugee laws.
References
Aloisi, A., & De Stefano, V. (2021). Essential jobs, remote work and digital surveillance: addressing the COVID-19 pandemic panopticon. International Labour Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12219
Balestrino, A. (2022). Extra-vacant narratives: reading Holocaust fiction in the post-9/11 age. Extra-Vacant Narratives, 1–190.
Bauer, J. (2022). Overview and Historical Background of U.S. Asylum Law. In Asylum Medicine (pp. 1–13). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81580-6_1
Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. K. (2008). Against intellectual monopoly. Against Intellectual Monopoly (pp. 1–299). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510854
Brunner, L. R. (2022). Higher education institutions as eyes of the state: Canada’s international student compliance regime. Globalization, Societies and Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2037407
Bucan, S., Dolmat, N., Hajjaji, S., Keller, L., & Sanji, A.-M. (2020). Non-Refoulement and the Case of the Rohingya. Current Events. https://crgreview.com/non-refoulement-and-the-case-of-the-rohingya/
Charlton, R., Farley, L. T., & Kaye, R. (1988). Identifying the mainsprings of US refugee and asylum policy: A contextual interpretation. Journal of Refugee Studies, 1(3–4), 237–259.
Crawshaw, R., & Holmström, L. (2001). American Convention on Human Rights” Pact of San José, Costa Rica”. In Essential Texts on Human Rights for the Police (pp. 165–193). Brill Nijhoff.
Duffy, A. (2008). Expulsion to face torture? Non-refoulement in international law. International Journal of Refugee Law, 20(3), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315244969
El-Enany, N. (2011). Who is the New European Refugee? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1033334
Fujibayashi, H. (2022). Why Do States Contribute to the Global Refugee Governance? Fiscal Burden-Sharing in the Post-2011 Syrian Refugee Crisis. International Interactions, 1–29.
Gallego, A., & Kurer, T. (2022). Automation, Digitalization, and Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace: Implications for Political Behavior. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-104535
Grabova, Y. (2016). Concept of non-refoulement as a principle of asylum. Evropsky Politicky a Pravni Diskurz, 3, Iss. 4, 48–52.
Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Macedonia: (March 1999 – present) , 5 January 2001, MCD36153.E , available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3df4be67c.html
Jarausch, K. H. (2021). Embattled Europe: A Progressive Alternative. Princeton University Press.
Johansson, L. (2006). The impact of the principle of non-refoulement on the Dublin Regulation and the Asylum Procedures Directive as adopted by the European Union.
Karenga, P. V. I. S. (2022). The Church’s Contribution to Combating Trafficking in West Africa. In A West African Model to Address Human Trafficking (pp. 323–374). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88120-7_12
Kawamura, Y. (2021). Public Sector Employment as a Social Welfare Policy: The “Social Contract” and Failed Job Creation for Youth in Egypt. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 23477989211050708. https://doi.org/10.1177/23477989211050707
Lahav, G. (2016). The global challenge of the refugee exodus. Current History, 115(777), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2016.115.777.10
Marx, R. (1995). Non-refoulement, access to procedures, and responsibility for determining refugee claims. International Journal of Refugee Law, 7(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/7.3.383
Maurer, C., Tvedt, J. N., & Muro, D. (2021). The US Refugee and Asylum Process: A Brief Analysis of US Resources and Policies.
McCaffrey, S. C., & Sinjela, M. (1998). The 1997 United Nations convention on international watercourses. American Journal of International Law, 92(1), 97–107.
Millas Villarrubia, E. (2021). Education for all? The right to education in Greek refugee camps. A case study.
Millbank, A. (2000). The problem with the 1951 Refugee Convention.[Research paper no. 5 2000-01.]. Information and Research Services, Social Policy Group. Canberra: Parliament of Australia [ Www. Aph. Gov. Au/Binaries/Library/Pubs/Rp/2000-01/01rp05. Pdf, 29, 2020.
Milkov LL.M., R. M. (2015). The Principle of Non-Refoulement in Light of Subsidiary Protection: A Review of the Prohibition on Refoulement and its Related Jurisprudence. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2669219
Milner, J. (2000). Sharing the security burden: Towards the convergence of refugee protection and state security.
Molnár, T. (2016). The principle of non-refoulement under international law: Its inception and evolution in a nutshell. Corvinus Journal of International Affairs, 1(1), 51–61.
Moodley, R. (2022). Rethinking “Regional Processing”: Could the Lessons Learned from the Comprehensive Plan of Action for Indochinese Refugees (CPA) Offer a Roadmap for International Cooperation in Response to ‘Regional’Refugee Situations? UNSW Law Research Paper, 22–4.
Nations, U., Commissioner, H., Ii, P., Assembly, G., & Ii, A. (1967). Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-Refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol * In this advisory opinion , the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refu. Commentary, 428(October), 1–19.
Nikodinovska Krstevska, A. (2022). Promoting Human Security of Migrants in Maritime Space: The Role of Non-State Actors in North Macedonia. Non-State Actors and Human Security in Navigable Spaces, 2, 116–127.
Öberg, M. D. (2005). The legal effects of resolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the jurisprudence of the ICJ. European Journal of International Law, 16(5), 879–906.
Organization, W. H. (2022). Ukraine crisis. Public health situation analysis: refugee-hosting countries, 17 March 2022. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
Prantl, J. M. A. (2022). Afghan Mass Displacement: The American Response in Light of Interna-tional Human Rights and Refugee Law, and the Need for International Co-operation to achieve a Satisfactory Solution. AUSTRIAN LAW JOURNAL, 1, 17–46.
Radoslav, M. (2015). The Principle of Non-Refoulement in Light of Subsidiary Protection.
Rahmatullah, T., Mamat, Z., Ismail, W. A. F. W., & Razali, R. M. (2022). Refugees in malaysia: issues and importance of a better legal management for refugees. International Journal of Social Science Research, 4(1), 194–215.
Rodger, J. (2009). Defining the parameters of the non-refoulement principle. World War II, 1–16.
Roman, E. (2022). The “Burden” of Being “Safe”—How Do Informal EU Migration Agreements Affect International Responsibility Sharing? In The Informalisation of the EU’s External Action in the Field of Migration and Asylum (pp. 317–346). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-487-7_14
Şengül, i. (n.d.). Unpacking temporary protection of refugees: failure of durable solutions and uncertainties. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.21492/inuhfd.992439
Sgobba, V. (2021). From the economic crisis to the rise of political populism in Western Europe: analysis of middle class decline, demographic decline, and migration crisis as socio political causes of the rise of right wing populism.
Solanes Corella, Á. (2013). Human rights and Conflicts in European Multicultural societies. Migraciones Internacionales, 7(1), 69–100.
Souter, J. (2022). Reparative Justice and International Refugee Responsibility-Sharing. In International Political Theory (pp. 169–188). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62448-4_9
Trevisanut, S. (2008). The principle of non-refoulement at sea and the effectiveness of asylum protection. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 12, 205–246. https://doi.org/10.1163/18757413-90000023a
United States Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, U.S. Committee for Refugees World Refugee Survey 2000 - United States, 1(6) http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6a8aa4.html
UNHCR (2007). Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-Refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol. Geneva: UNHCR. http://www.unhcr.org/4d9486929.html
Whitaker, R. (2002). Refugee Policy after September 11: Not Much New. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 29–33. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21271
Zhang, Q., Gao, S., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Analyzing the International Refugee System for Solving the Problem of Climate Migration. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (SDMC 2021) (Vol. 631). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220105.012
