Consequences of Capital formation, Trade Liberalization on the Economic Growth: Pakistan's Experience

Main Article Content

Nadia Bukhari
Anjum Iqbal

Abstract

This study considers the long run relationship between the liberalization of trade, capital formation and the economic growth of Pakistan by using the time series data from 1975-2013. The main aim of this study is to examine that how much liberalization of trade and capital formation affects the economic growth of Pakistan in long run. The approach that has been used for empirical analysis is Auto Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model. Under the ADF test capital formation (CF) is stationary at its first level but the trade openness (TO) and GDP is stationary at its first difference. Moreover, the granger casualty test is evident that there become a casual relationship between the trade openness and GDP. The result of this study shows that both the trade openness and the capital formation determined the economic growth in long run and they both have statistically significant effect on the GDP. Furthermore it has has been depicted from the study that the trade has a vital role to influence the economic growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Research Article

Author Biographies

Nadia Bukhari, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology

Department of Management Sciences

Anjum Iqbal, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology

Department of Management Sciences

How to Cite

Consequences of Capital formation, Trade Liberalization on the Economic Growth: Pakistan’s Experience. (2024). Journal of Management Info, 2(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.31580/jmi.v5i1.37

References

Adhikary, B. K. (2010). FDI, trade openness, capital formation, and economic growth in Bangladesh: a linkage analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(1), p16.

Andersen, L., & Babula, R. (2008). The link between openness and long-run economic ghttps://readersinsight.net/jmi/workflow/index/37/5#rowth. Journal of International Commerce and Economics, 1, 1-20.

Bibi, S., Ahmad, S. T., & Rashid, H. (2014). Impact of Trade Openness, FDI, Exchange Rate and Inflation on Economic Growth: A Case Study of Pakistan. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 4(2).

Belloumi, M. (2014). The relationship between trade, FDI and economic growth in Tunisia: An application of the autoregressive distributed lag model. Economic Systems.

Buch, C. M., & Toubal, F. (2009). Openness and growth: The long shadow of the Berlin Wall. Journal of Macroeconomics, 31(3), 409-422.

Chang, R., Kaltani, L., & Loayza, N. V. (2009). Openness can be good for growth: The role of policy complementarities. Journal of development economics, 90(1), 33-49.

Chadha, S. K., Singh, B., & Natarajan, V. S. (2014). Interaction among foreign direct investment, economic growth and foreign trade: evidence from India and China. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 4(2), 145-166.

Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2001). Trade, growth, and poverty. World Bank, Development Research Group, Macroeconomics and Growth.

Dritsakis, N., Varelas, E., & Adamopoulos, A. (2006). The main determinants of economic growth: An empirical investigation with Granger causality analysis for Greece. European Research Studies Journal, 9(3-4), 47-58.

Faridi, M. Z. (2012). Contribution of Agricultural Exports to Economic Growth in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences, 6(1).

Fiestas, I. (2005). The effects of trade liberalization on growth, poverty and inequality. CILAE Nota técnica NT/04, 5.

Greenaway, D., Morgan, W., & Wright, P. (2002). Trade liberalisation and growth in developing countries. Journal of development economics, 67(1), 229-244.

Gries, T., & Redlin, M. (2012). Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A Panel Causality Analysis. Center for International Economics, Working Paper Series, (2011-06).

Harrison, A. (1996), “Openness and growth: A time-series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 48, p. 419-447.

Kogid, M., Mulok, D., Ching, K. S., Lily, J., Ghazali, M. F., & Loganathan, N. Does Import Affect Economic Growth in Malaysia.

Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. The American economic review, 942-963.

Owolabi, A., & Ajayi, N. O. (2013). Econometrics Analysis of Impact of Capital Market on Economic Growth in Nigeria (1971-2010). Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(1), 99-110.

Romer, P. (1993). Idea gaps and object gaps in economic development. Journal of monetary economics, 32(3), 543-573.

Shirazi, N. S., Manap, T. A. A., & Din, M. U. (2004). Exports and Economic Growth Nexus: the Case of Pakistan [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 563-581.

Shahbaz, M., Khan, S., & Tahir, M. I. (2013). The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis. Energy Economics, 40, 8-21.

Tabassum, N., & Ahmed, S. P. (2014). Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(9), p117.

Turan, G., & Seni, D. (2014). The Effect of Trade Openness on Economic Growth: Albanian Case. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(3), 193.

Ugochukwu, U. S., & Chinyere, U. P. (2013). The Impact of Capital Formation on the Growth of Nigerian Economy. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(9), 36-42.

Veeramani, C. (2009). Impact of imported intermediate and capital goods on economic growth: A cross country analysis. Available at SSRN 1325181.

Yanikkya, H. (2003). Trade openness and economic growth: a cross country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economies, 72, 57-89.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.