Sustainability in virtual education: A case study of virtual university of Pakistan

Main Article Content

Bilal Ahmed Abbasi
Ambreen Gul


The penetration of technology has helped in better online learning and training around the world by minimizing the time and space issues coupled with traditional education and training. Regardless of the several benefits, keeping students on online platforms is an arduous task. Taking the case study of the Virtual University of Pakistan, this paper explores the impact of personal and environmental factors on online Leaner’s intention to continue through satisfaction. Primary data was gathered from 361 students of 3 regional campuses through a self-administrated closed-ended questionnaire. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze the data in SmartPLS software. The study results indicate that only the provision of satisfying personal and environmental factors by distance learning higher education institutions can help them in attracting and retaining students. The post-COVID-19 situation has made the student intake and retention task even harder as the traditional education institution has also built the capabilities to provide online education and diminishing the niche market of virtual education institutions.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sustainability in virtual education: A case study of virtual university of Pakistan. (2023). Journal of Management Info, 10(3), 200-211.
Research Article

How to Cite

Sustainability in virtual education: A case study of virtual university of Pakistan. (2023). Journal of Management Info, 10(3), 200-211.


Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950.

Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28-38.

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.

Chang, B., & Kang, H. (2016). Challenges facing group work online. Distance education, 37(1), 73-88.

Chang, V. (2016). Review and discussion: E-learning for academia and industry. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 476-485.

Cheng, Y. M. (2012). Effects of quality antecedents on e‐learning acceptance. Internet Research, 22(3), 361-390.

Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook?. Computers in human behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343.

Chiu, C. M., Sun, S. Y., Sun, P. C., & Ju, T. L. (2007). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of web-based learning continuance. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1224-1245.

Dağhan, G., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2016). Modeling the continuance usage intention of online learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 198-211.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30.

El Mhouti, A., Erradi, M., & Nasseh, A. (2018). Using cloud computing services in e-learning process: Benefits and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 893-909.

Hanley, M. (2018). Elearning adoption in organizations 2: characteristics of the diffusion process.

Hsu, M. H., Chang, C. M., & Yen, C. H. (2011). Exploring the antecedents of trust in virtual communities. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(5), 587-601.

Hu, P. J. H., & Hui, W. (2012). Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness and satisfaction. Decision support systems, 53(4), 782-792.

Jin, B., Park, J. Y., & Kim, H. S. (2010). What makes online community members commit? A social exchange perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(6), 587-599.

Jolliffe, A., Ritter, J., & Stevens, D. (2012). The online learning handbook: Developing and using web-based learning. Routledge.

Kang, Y. S., Hong, S., & Lee, H. (2009). Exploring continued online service usage behavior: The roles of self-image congruity and regret. Computers in human behavior, 25(1), 111-122.

Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B., & Madden, J. (2017). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of e-learning, 15(2), pp107-115.

Kim, B., & Oh, J. (2011). The difference of determinants of acceptance and continuance of mobile data services: A value perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1798-1804.

Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512-1520.

Knight, S. A., & Burn, J. M. (2011). A preliminary introduction to the OTAM: Exploring users’ perceptions of their on-going interaction with adopted technologies. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 17(1).

Limayem, M., & Cheung, C. M. (2008). Understanding information systems continuance: The case of Internet-based learning technologies. Information & management, 45(4), 227-232.

Nazir, U., Davis, H., & Harris, L. (2015). First day stands out as most popular among MOOC leavers.

Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1-14.

Perna, L. W., Ruby, A., Boruch, R. F., Wang, N., Scull, J., Ahmad, S., & Evans, C. (2014). Moving through MOOCs: Understanding the progression of users in massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 421-432.

Research and Markets Global E-learning Market 2018–2023: Market is Expected to Reach $65.41 Billion. (2018a).

Research and Markets Global Learning Management System (LMS) Market Analysis and Forecasts 2017–2025 – Need for LMS in HEO Driving Market Growth. (2018b).

Ros, S., Hernández, R., Caminero, A., Robles, A., Barbero, I., Maciá, A., & Holgado, F. P. (2015). On the use of extended TAM to assess students' acceptance and intent to use third‐generation learning management systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1250-1271.

Shiau, W. L., & Luo, M. M. (2013). Continuance intention of blog users: the impact of perceived enjoyment, habit, user invo lvement and blogging time. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(6), 570-583.

Shin, D. H., Biocca, F., & Choo, H. (2013). Exploring the user experience of three-dimensional virtual learning environments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 203-214.

Sun, H. (2013). A longitudinal study of herd behavior in the adoption and continued use of technology. Mis Quarterly, 37(4), 1013-1041.

Sun, H., Fang, Y., & Hsieh, J. P. A. (2014). Consuming information systems: An economic model of user satisfaction. Decision support systems, 57, 188-199.

Zheng, Y., Zhao, K., & Stylianou, A. (2013). The impacts of information quality and system quality on users' continuance intention in information-exchange virtual communities: An empirical investigation. Decision support systems, 56, 513-524.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.