Openness to experience moderates the effect of abusive supervision on knowledge-hiding behavior

Main Article Content

Muhammad Tufail
Muhammad Kamran Khan
Shahab Jouhar
Muhammad Taimur Khan

Abstract

Organizations recognize knowledge as a source of a competitive edge. Organizations have made significant efforts to improve the scope of information sharing among employees to improve creativity and innovation. Despite these safeguards, employees continue to conceal their knowledge from their coworkers. Further, leadership style plays a crucial role in employee behavior. Therefore, this study investigates the relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge hiding behavior. Moreover, the moderating role of openness to experience has been explored. Data were collected from faculty members (N=309) from the different universities using questionnaires following a simple random sampling technique. The results revealed a direct relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge hiding. Openness to experience was negatively correlated with knowledge hiding. Further, the moderating role of openness to experience between abusive supervision and knowledge hiding relationship was low but significant. The implications and limitations of this study are also discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Research Article

Author Biographies

Muhammad Tufail, Institute of Business Studies and Leadership, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan

Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan

Muhammad Kamran Khan, Department of Management Sciences & Commerce, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, KPK, Pakistan

Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, KPK, Pakistan

Shahab Jouhar, Institute of Business Studies and Leadership, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan

Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan

Muhammad Taimur Khan, Department of Management Sciences & Commerce, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, KPK, Pakistan

Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, KPK, Pakistan

How to Cite

Openness to experience moderates the effect of abusive supervision on knowledge-hiding behavior. (2024). Journal of Management Info, 10(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.31580/jmi.v10i1.2755

References

Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M. A., & Elçi, A. (2019). Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 104-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003

Ahmed, Q., Sumbal, M. S., Akhtar, M. N. & Tariq, H. (2021). Abusive supervision and the knowledge worker productivity: the mediating role of knowledge management processes. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(10), 2506-2522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2020-0632

Anand, P., & Jain, K. K. (2014). Big five personality types & knowledge hiding behaviour: A theoretical framework. Archives of Business Research, 2(5), 47-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.25.355

Annansingh, F., Howell, K.E., Liu, S. & Baptista Nunes, M. (2018). Academics’ perception of knowledge sharing in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(6), 1001-1015. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2016-0153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2016-0153

Argote, L., & Fahrenkopf, E. (2016). Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 146-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.003

Amiri, M., Farhoodi, F., Abdolvand, N., & Bidakhavidi, A. R. (2011). A study of the relationship between Big-five personality traits and communication styles with marital satisfaction of married students majoring in public universities of Tehran. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 30, 685-689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.132

Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 14(2), 126-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.1997.tb00124.x

Ayub, A., Ajmal, T., Iqbal, S., Ghazanfar, S., Anwaar, M., & Ishaq, M. (2021). Abusive supervision and knowledge hiding in service organizations: exploring the boundary conditions. International Journal of Conflict Management. 32(5), 725-746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-02-2021-0029

Banagou, M., Batistič, S., Do, H., & Poell, R. F. (2021). Relational climates moderate the effect of openness to experience on knowledge hiding: A two-country multi-level study. Journal of Knowledge Management. 25(11), 60-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0613

Bari, M. W., Misbah, G. & Bashir, A. (2020). Knowledge-hiding behaviors and employees’ silence:mediating role of psychological contract breach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2171-2194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0149

Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Prabhu, J., & Vargo, S. L. (2015). Service innovation in the digital age. MIS quarterly, 39(1), 135-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39:1.03

Berry, C. M., Carpenter, N. C. & Barratt, C. L. (2012). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison, Journal of Applied Psychology, 7(3), 613-636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026739

Bjorvatn, T., & Wald, A. (2020). The impact of time pressure on knowledge transfer effectiveness in teams: trust as a critical but fragile mediator. Journal of Knowledge Management. 24(10), 2357-2372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2020-0379

Blau, P. (1964). Power and Exchange in Social Life; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA.

Bogilovic S., Cerne M. & Škerlavaj M. (2017). Hiding behind a mask? Cultural intelligence, knowledge hiding, and individual and team creativity. Europian Journal Work of Organizational Psychology. 26, 710–723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1337747

Burmeister, A., Fasbender, U., & Gerpott, F. H. (2019). Consequences of knowledge hiding: The differential compensatory effects of guilt and shame. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 92(2), 281-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12249

Butt, A. S. (2020). Mitigating knowledge hiding in firms: an exploratory study. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(4), 631-645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2020-0016

Butt, M. A., Nawaz, F., Hussain, S., Sousa, M. J., Wang, M., Sumbal, M. S., & Shujahat, M. (2019). Individual knowledge management engagement, knowledge-worker productivity, and innovation performance in knowledge-based organizations: the implications for knowledge processes and knowledge-based systems. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 25(3), 336-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-018-9270-z

Cabrera, A., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500404614

Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A. & Blumenthal, D. (2002). Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. (JAMA), 287(4), 473-480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.4.473

Cappa, F., Pinelli, M., Maiolini, R. & Leone, M. I. (2020). Pledge me your ears! the role of narratives and narrator experience in explaining crowdfunding success. Small Bus. Econ, pp. 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00334-y

Cerne, M., Nerstad, C. G. L., Dysvik, A. & Skerlavaj, M. (2014). What goes around comes around: knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 172-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0122

Chaudhry, A. B. (2005). Knowledge sharing practices in Asian institutions: a multi-cultural perspective from Singapore. Libraries – A voyage of discovery proceedings of the 71th IFLA General Conference and Council in Oslo, Norway.

Connelly, C. E., & Zweig, D. (2015). How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(3), 479-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.931325

Connelly, C. E., Cerne, M., Dysvik, A. & S ˇkerlavaj, M. (2019). Understanding knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 779-782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2407

Connelly, C. E., Ford, D.P., Turel, O., Gallupe, B. & Zweig, D. (2014). “‘I’m busy (and competitive)!’ Antecedents of knowledge sharing under pressure, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 12(1), 74-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2012.61

Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J. & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 64-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.737

Corr, P. J., & Matthews, G. E. (2020). The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108264822

Demirkasimoglu, N. (2016). Knowledge Hiding in Academia: Is Personality a Key Factor?. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(1), 128-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n1p128

Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10022-000

Donia, M. B., Raja, U., Panaccio, A. & Wang, Z. (2016). Servant leadership and employee outcomes: the moderating role of subordinates’ motives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(5), 722-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1149471

Feng, J., & Wang, C. (2019). Does abusive supervision always promote employees to hide knowledge? From both reactance and COR perspectives. Journal of Knowledge Management. 23(7), 1455-1474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0737

Ferraris, A., Santoro, G. & Dezi, L. (2017). How MNC’s subsidiaries may improve their innovative performance? The role of external sources and knowledge management capabilities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 540-552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0411

Fong, P. S., Men, C., Luo, J., & Jia, R. (2018). Knowledge hiding and team creativity: the contingent role of task interdependence. Management Decision, 56(2), 329-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2016-0778

Garg, N., & Anand, P. (2020). Knowledge hiding, conscientiousness, loneliness and affective commitment: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Educational Management. 34(9), 1417-1437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2018-0231

Ghani, U., Zhai, X., Spector, J. M., Chen, N. S., Lin, L., Ding, D. & Usman, M. (2020). Knowledge hiding in higher education: role of interactional justice and professional commitment. Higher Education. 79(2), 325-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00412-5

Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American sociological review, 161-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623

Grey, C., & Costas, J. (2016). Invisible organizations–a research agenda. A Research Agenda for Management and Organization Studies. 136–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784717025.00019

Guadagno, R. E., Okdie, B. M. & Eno, C. A. (2008). Who blogs? Personality predictors of blogging. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1993-2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.09.001

Gul, R. F., Dunnan, L., Jamil, K., Awan, F. H., Ali, B., Qaiser, A., & Aobin, Q. (2021). Abusive supervision and its impact on knowledge hiding behavior among sales force. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 800778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800778

Gupta, B. (2008). Role of personality in knowledge sharing and knowledge acquisition behavior. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 34(1), 143-149.

Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W. & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: the neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 264-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.008

He, P., Jiang, C., Xu, Z., & Shen, C. (2021). Knowledge hiding: current research status and future research directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748237

Hernaus, T., Cerne, M., Connelly, C., Vokic, N. P., & Škerlavaj, M. (2019). Evasive knowledge hiding in academia: when competitive individuals are asked to collaborate. Journal of Knowledge Management. 23(4), 597-618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2017-0531

Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, culture, and community: The psychology and philosophy of stress. New York: Plenum Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0115-6

Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied psychology, 50(3), 337-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062

Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of general psychology, 6(4), 307-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.6.4.307

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Jha, J. K., & Varkkey, B. (2018). Are you a cistern or a channel? Exploring factors triggering knowledge-hiding behavior at the workplace: evidence from the Indian R&D professionals. Journal of Knowledge Management. 22(4), 824-849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2017-0048

John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 102-138.

Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1149-1179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0837

Khalid, M., Bashir, S., Khan, A. K., & Abbas, N. (2018). When and how abusive supervision leads to knowledge hiding behaviors: An Islamic work ethics perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 39(6), 794-806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2017-0140

Kianto, A., M. Shujahat, S. Hussain, F. Nawaz, & M. Ali. (2019). The Impact of Knowledge Management on Knowledge Worker Productivity. Baltic Journal of Management, 14(2), 178–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-12-2017-0404

Kim, S. L., Lee, S. & Yun, S. (2016). Abusive supervision, knowledge sharing, and individual factors: a conservation-of-resources perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(6), 1106-1120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2015-0169

Lee, J. Y., Lee, Y. & Wadhwa, P. (2010). Conference paper sharing among academicians: calculative and normative aspects of rational choice. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 204-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.2.zqr204

Lee, S., Kim, S. L. & Yun, S. (2018). A moderated mediation model of the relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge sharing. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(3), 403-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.001

Lun, V. M. C., & Bond, M. H. (2006). Achieving relationship harmony in groups and its consequence for group performance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(3), 195-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00197.x

Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (2017). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of management, 43(6), 1940-1965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315573997

Major, D. A., Turner, J. E. & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the big five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 927- 935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.927

Malik, O. F., Shahzad, A., Raziq, M. M., Khan, M. M., Yusaf, S., & Khan, A. (2019). Perceptions of organizational politics, knowledge hiding, and employee creativity: The moderating role of professional commitment. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 232-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.005

Matzler, K., & Mueller, J. (2011). Antecedents of knowledge sharing–Examining the influence of learning and performance orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(3), 317-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.12.006

McAdams, D. P. (2009). The moral personality. Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology, 11-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627125.002

McCrae, R. R. & Sutin, A. R. (2009). Openness to experience. Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior, 15, 257-273.

Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of applied psychology, 92(4), 1159-1168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159

Ng, T. (2015). Conservation of resources theory. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 1–1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom060033

Nguyen, N. T., & Biderman, M. (2013). Predicting counterproductive work behavior from a bi-factor model of Big Five personality. In Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. 2013, 13719-13719). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2013.13719abstract

Pan, W., Zhang, Q., Teo, T.S. & Lim, V.K. (2018). The dark triad and knowledge hiding. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 36-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.008

Peng, H. (2013). Why and when do people hide knowledge?. Journal of knowledge management. 17(3), 398-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2012-0380

Penney, L. M., David, E. & Witt, L. (2011). A review of personality and performance: identifying boundaries, contingencies, and future research directions. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 297-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.10.005

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 36(4), 717-731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

Restubog, S. L. D., Scott, K. L. & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2011). When distress hits home: the role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 713-729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021593

Samdani, H., Ali, B. & Kamal, N. (2019). Knowledge hiding and creativity in higher education institutes: understanding the contingent role of perceived supervisory support. Global Social Sciences Review, 4(4), 341-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).44

Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2016). Understanding counterproductive knowledge behavior: antecedents and consequences of intra-organizational knowledge hiding. Journal of knowledge management. 20(6), 1199-1224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2016-0203

Shujahat, M., Akhtar, A., Nawaz, F., Wang, M. & Sumbal, M. S. (2020). Knowledge risk management in two-tier HRM structures in Durst, S. and Henschel, T. (Eds), Knowledge Risk Management: From Theory to Praxis, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 49-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35121-2_4

Simha, A., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2020). The big 5 personality traits and willingness to justify unethical behavior a cross-national examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(3), 451-471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04142-7

Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M. & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (6), 1239-1251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478718

Staw, B. M., Bell, N. E. & Clausen, J. A. (1986). The dispositional approach to job attitudes: a lifetime longitudinal test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 56-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392766

Stewart, G. L., Fulmer, I. S., & Barrick, M. R. (2005). An exploration of member roles as a multilevel linking mechanism for individual traits and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 343-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00480.x

Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of management journal, 43(2), 178-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375

Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., Lockhart, D. E., & Carr, J. C. (2007). Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates' psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1169-1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.20159918

Tepper, B.J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C. & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: a power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 156-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.004

Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied psychology, 88(3), 500-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500

Tufail, M., Khan, S., Gul, R., & Rashid, M, H (2022). Servant Leadership and Knowledge Hiding: the Moderating Role of Personality Traits in Academic Settings. International Review of Basic and Applied Sciences. 10(2), 225-236.

Wang, C., Wei, Y., Zhao, X., Zhang, X., & Peng, Y. (2021). Abusive supervision and creativity: Investigating the moderating role of performance improvement attribution and the mediating role of psychological availability. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 2222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658743

Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human resource management review, 20(2), 115-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001

Wang, Y. S., Lin, H.-H., Li, C. R. & Lin, S. J. (2014). What drives students’ knowledge-withholding intention in management education? An empirical study in Taiwan. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(4), 547-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0066

Webster, J., Brown, G., Zweig, D., Connelly, C., Brodt, S., & Sitkin, s. (2008). Beyond Knowledge Sharing: Knowledge Hiding and Hoarding at Work. Research in personnel and human resources management, 27, 1-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(08)27001-5

Weng, Q., Latif, K., Khan, A. K., Tariq, H., Butt, H. P., Obaid, A., & Sarwar, N. (2020). Loaded with knowledge, yet green with envy: leader–member exchange comparison and coworkers-directed knowledge hiding behavior. Journal of Knowledge Management. 24 (7), 1653-1680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2019-0534

Wu, W. L., & Lee, Y. C. (2016). Do employees share knowledge when encountering abusive supervision?. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 31(1), 154-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2013-0410

Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J. & Duffy, M.K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068-1076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.6.1068

Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Xu, S., Yang, L. Q., & Bednall, T. C. (2019). Why abusive supervision impacts employee OCB and CWB: A meta-analytic review of competing mediating mechanisms. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2474-2497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318823935

Zhao, H., Xia, Q., He, P., Sheard, G., & Wan, P. (2016). Workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding in service organizations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 59, 84-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.09.009

Zhou, G., Gul, R., & Tufail, M. (2022). Does Servant Leadership Stimulate Work Engagement? The Moderating Role of Trust in the Leader. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:925732, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925732

Zweig, D., & Scott, K. A. (2018, July). Exploring distrust, paranoia, knowledge hiding and abusive supervision over time. In Academy of Management Proceedings. No. 1, p. 10312). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.10312abstract

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.