Uncovering the Genetic Potential of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.) Genotypes against Water Deficit Condition

rapeseed evaluation for water stress

Authors

  • Sajid Hussain Rao Sindh Agriculture University and Agriculture Research Sindh
  • Abdul Wahid Baloch Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam.
  • Siraj Ahmad Channa Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam.
  • Liaquat Ali Bhutto Agriculture Research Center, Tandojam.
  • Saima Bano Agriculture Research Center, Tandojam.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31580/pjmls.v4i4.2176

Keywords:

Drought, canola, genetic variation, seed yield, physiological parameters

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Water shortage is a key abiotic issue that restricts agricultural yield in several parts of Pakistan, as well as globally. Despite many attempts made over the last several years, rapeseed crop productivity has remained unchanged, even though there is a lot of genetic diversity in rapeseed genotypes for seed production and other economic characteristics. In this study, a set of 20 rapeseed cultivars were tested for resistance to water stress in natural field using a randomized complete block design (RCBD) in a factorial setting with four replications for six physiological and yield and oil traits, while three water systems (Treatments = T) were applied for this investigation. T1 was considered as control/normal with four irrigations, T2 was considered as water stress at maturity with three irrigations and T3 was regarded as water stress at silique formation with two irrigations. Mean squares of different sources (genotypes, water treatments, and their interaction) was significant for all studied characters, urging the importance of these genetic resources for future breeding. Considering the average performance under three water systems, the set of six genotypes of rapeseed such as NARC Sarson, CON-1, Punjab Sarson, Rainbow, Rohi Sarson and Hyola-I were tagged as potential rapeseed genetic stock for water stress breeding. This suggests that these rapeseed genotypes might give valuable genetic recombinations for water stress situations, and hence could be used in future breeding efforts.

References

1. Hosaini Y, Homaee, M., Karimian, N.A., Saadat S. Modeling vegetative stage response of canola (Brassica napus L.) to combined salinity and boron tresses. International Journal of Plant Production. 2009;(3):91-104.
2. Anonymous. Economic Survey of Pakistan, Ministry of Food and Agriculture (Economics Wing), Islamabad, Pakistan. 2014-15.
3. Araus JL, Slafer, G.A., Reynolds, M.P., Royo C. Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what to breed for? Annals of Botany. 2002;(89):925-940.
4. Micheletto S, Rodriguez-Uribe, L., Hernandez, R., Richins, R.D., Curry, V., Connell M.A. Comparative transcript profiling in roots of Phaseolus acutifolius and P. vulgaris under water deficit stress. Plant Sciences. 2007;173 (5):510-520.
5. Shirani RAH, Abbasian, A., Aminpanah H. Evaluation of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars for resistance against water deficit stress. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2013;(19):266-273.
6. Aliakbari M, Razi, H., Kazemeini S.A. Evaluation of drought tolerance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars using drought tolerance indices. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. 2014;2(3): 696-705.
7. Ghosh PK, Ajay, K.K., Bandyopadhyay, M.C., Manna, K.G., Mandal A.K. Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping system in vertisols of semi-arid tropics. Bioresource Technology. 2004;(95):85-93.
8. Jaleel CA, Manivannan, P., Lakshmanan, G.M.A., Gomathi-nayagam, M., Panneerselvam R. Alterations in morphological parameters and photosynthetic pigment responses of Catharanthusroseus under soil water deficits. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2008;(61):298-303.
9. Sarker BC, Hara, M., Uemura M. Proline synthesis, physiological responses and biomass yield of eggplants during and after repetitive soil moisture stress. Scientia Horticulturae. 2005;103 (4):387-402.
10. Lugojan C, Ciulca S. Evaluation of relative water content in winter wheat. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology. 2011;(15):173-177.
11. Sade N, Gebremedhin, A., Moshelion M. Risk-taking plants: anisohydric behavior as a stress-resistance trait. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2012;7(7):767-770.
12. Eslam BP. Evaluation of physiological indices, yield and its components as screening techniques for water deficit tolerance in oilseed rape cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2009;(11):413-422.
13. Chandrasekar V, Sairam, R.K., Srivastava G.C. Physiological and biochemical responses of hexaploid and tetraploid wheat to drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2000;(185):219-227.
14. Rosales-Sernaa R, Kohashi-Shibataa, J., Acosta-Gallegosb, J.A., Trejo-Lo Peza, C., Ortiz-Cereceresc J. Biomass distribution, maturity acceleration and yield in drought-stressed common bean cultivars. Field Crops Research. 2004;(85):203-211.
15. Gan Y, Angadi, S.V., Cutforth, H.W., Potts, D., Angadi, V.V., Mc Donald C.L. Canola and mustard response to short period of high temperature and water stress at different developmental stages. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2004;(84):697-704.
16. Sinaki JM, Heravan, E.M., Ra, A.H.S., Noormohammadi, G., Zarei G. The effects of water deficit during growth stages of canola (Brassica napus L.). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences. 2007;(4):417-422.
17. Rahnema M, Bakhshande A.M. Determination of optimum irrigation level and compatible canola varieties in the Mediterranean environment. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 2006;(5):543-546.
18. Majidi MM, Rashidi, F., Sharafi Y. Physiological traits related to drought tolerance in Brassica. International Journal of Plant Production. 2015;9(4):541-560.
19. Malekei E, Sinaki J.M. The effect of irrigation and nitrogen on yield and yield components of spring rapeseed. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2005;1(1):35-43.
20. Nasri M, Khalatbari, M., Zahedi, H., Paknejad, F., Moghadam H.R. Evaluation of micro and macro elements in drought stress condition in cultivars of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences. 2008;3(3):579-583.
21. Shirani RAH, Zandi, P. The effect of drought stress on qualitative and quantitative traits of spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture. 2012;99(1):47–54.
22. Istanbulluoglu A, Arslan, B., Gocmen, E., Gezer, E., Pasa C. Effects of deficit irrigation regimes on the yield and growth of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Biosystems Engineering. 2010;105(3):388-394.
23. Tesfamariam EH, Annandale, J.G., Steyn J.M. Water stress effects on winter canola growth and yield. Agronomy Journal. 2010;102(2):658-666.
24. Hare PD. Molecular characterization of the gene encoding Æ 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. M.Sc. Thesis, Natal University, South Africa. 1995.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31