Impact of Structural Empowerment and Employee Engagement on Adaptive Performance: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Hoarding

Main Article Content

Shaista Jabeen
Rizwan Qaiser Danish

Abstract

In the most recent times, due to the worldwide pandemic situation, business organizations are confronting with different work environments, and working in the organizations is different from the previous time. Nowadays, the demand for adaptive workers has augmented, and it is compulsory for employees to adapt well to the modifications. In this rapidly changing and volatile work environment, the current research investigates the impact of structural empowerment (SE) and employee engagement (EE) on employee adaptive performance (AP). This study aims to have an empirical investigation of the mediating role of knowledge hoarding on adaptive performance in the dominant context of engaged and empowered employees. The purpose of this research is to test a theoretical model linking employee engagement and workplace empowerment to the employees’ adaptive performance through a mediation mechanism of knowledge hoarding in the growing environment of the services sector of Pakistan.






The proposed theoretical model suggests that fear and anxiety mediate the relationship between project uncertainties and the use of improvisation as an adaptive response to uncertainties. Trait positive affect may strengthen this relationship, since individuals high in this trait might manage their emotions in a way that will lead to higher improvisation levels with impact on innovation.


This study will also empirically investigate the moderating role of experimental culture, availability of real time information and communication as well as team work quality and expertise in project teams between improvisation and innovation.






 Descriptive, correlation and regression analyses were run to analyze the data. Tools of ADANCO 2.2.1 and SPSS 23 were applied to perform data analysis. To measure and explain the proposed model, well-established scales are adopted. The outcomes of this research study show that structural empowerment (SE) and EE statistically impact adaptive performance (AP) and improve it.  However, EE and SE incline to undermine KH.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jabeen , S. ., & Danish, R. Q. (2022). Impact of Structural Empowerment and Employee Engagement on Adaptive Performance: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Hoarding. Journal of Public Value and Administrative Insight, 4(4), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.31580/jpvai.v4i4.2494
Section
Articles

References

References

Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Construct-oriented biodata: Capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 97-111.

Almahamid, S., McAdams, A. C., & Kalaldeh, T. (2010). The Relationships among Organizational Knowledge Sharing Practices, Employees' Learning Commitments, Employees' Adaptability, and Employees' Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Investigation of the Listed Manufacturing Companies in Jordan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge & Management, 5.

Al-Abbadi, L., Alshawabkeh, R., & Rumman, A. (2020). Knowledge management processes and innovation performance: The moderating effect of employees’ knowledge hoarding. Management Science Letters, 10(7), 1463-1472.

Al-dalahmeh, M., Masa’deh, R, Khalaf, R., K., A., & Obeidat, B.Y. (2018). The Effect of Employee Engagement on Organizational Performance via the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction: The Case of IT Employees in Jordanian Banking Sector, Modern Applied Science, 12(6).

Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189–1207.

Battistelli, A., Montani, F., & Odoardi, C. (2013). The impact of feedback from job and task autonomy in the relationship between dispositional resistance to change and innovative work behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(1), 26–41.

Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., &Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187-200.

Burke, M. J. (2008). On the skilled aspect of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 70–71.

Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E. & Dollard, M. (2008). How job demands influence partners’ experience of exhaustion: integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 901-911.

Bakti, A, S. (2016). The Impact of Organizational Culture and Employee Engagement on Employee Work Performance Civil Society Organization IPPA HQ. e-Proceeding of Management, 3(3)

Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology.

Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations, 35-70. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29, 280-293.

Chen, G., Thomas, B., & Wallace, J. C. (2005). A multilevel examination of the relationships among training outcomes, mediating regulatory processes, and adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 827–841.

Chebat, J. C., & Kollias, P. (2000). The impact of empowerment on customer contact employees’ roles in service organizations. Journal of Services Research, 3(1), 66 – 81.

Conger, J. A. (1989). Leadership: The art of empowering others. Academy of Management Executive, 3(1), 17–24.

Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471– 482.

Dorsey, D., Cortina, J., & Luchman, J. (2010). Adaptive and citizenship-related behaviors at work. In J. Farr & N. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 463-487). New York, NY: Routledge.

Dahani, A, A, Z. (2015). The Impact of Employee Engagement on Job Performance and Organizational Commitment in the Egyptian Banking Sector. Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 3(5), 138-147.

Erickson, R. J. (2005). Why emotion work matters: Sex, gender, and the division of household labor. Journal of marriage and family, 67(2), 337-351.

Frese, M., Garst, H., & Fay, D. (2007). Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1084–1102.

Forrester, R. (2000). Empowerment: Rejuvenating a potent idea. Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 67– 80.

Ford, R. C., & Fottler, M. D. (1995). Empowerment: A matter of degree. Academy of Management Executive, 9(3), 21–29.

Fidyah, D. N., & Setiawati, T. (2020). Influence of organizational culture and employee engagement on employee performance: job satisfaction as intervening variable. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 9(4), 64-81.

Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327-347.

Hartline, M. D., & Ferrell, O. C. (1996). The management of customer-contact service employees: An empirical investigation. Journal of Marketing, 60(10), 52–70.

Hui, C. (1994). Effects of leader empowerment behaviors and followers' personal control, voice, and self-efficacy on in-role and extra-role performance: An extension and empirical test of Conger and Kanungo's empowerment process model (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University).

Huntsman, D., Greer, A., Murphy, H., & Haynes, S. (2021). Enhancing adaptive performance in emergency response: Empowerment practices and the moderating role of tempo balance. Safety Science, 134, 105060.

Haynie, J., Flynn, C. B., & Herda, D. (2020). Linking career adaptability to supervisor-rated task performance: a serial mediation model. Career Development International.

Hesketh, B., & Neal, A. (1999). Technology and performance. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (21-55). San-Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Holten, A., Robert Hancock, G., Persson, R., Marie Hansen, Å., & Høgh, A. (2016). Knowledge hoarding: antecedent or consequent of negative acts? The mediating role of trust and justice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(2), 215-229.

Hameduddin, T., & Fernandez, S. (2019). Employee engagement as administrative reform: Testing the efficacy of the OPM's employee engagement initiative. Public administration review, 79(3), 355-369.

Harcourt, H., & Ateke, B. W. (2018). Customer-contact employee empowerment and resilience of quick-service restaurants. European Journal of Human Resource Management Studies.

Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 797.

Jabeen, S., Danish, R. Q., Sheikh, L., Ramzan, M., & Hasnain, M. (2020). Influence of Workplace Mistreatment and Structural Empowerment on Employee Engagement through Knowledge Hoarding. Pakistan Journal of Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 11(2).

Jundt, D. K., Shoss, M. K., & Huang, J. L. (2015). Individual adaptive performance in organizations: A review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S53-S71.

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724.

Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Kanter, R. M. (1993). Men and Women of the Corporation, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Kim, W., Kolb, J. A., & Kim, T. (2013). The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Performance: A Review of Empirical Literature and a Proposed Research Agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 12(3), 248–276.

Kanter, R. M. (1989). The new managerial work. Harvard Business Review, 67(6), 85–92.

Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C., Hildebrandt, V., van Buuren, S., Van der Beek, A. J., & de Vet, H. C. (2013). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. International journal of productivity and performance management.

Laschinger, H. K. S., Wilk, P, Cho J, et al. (2009a). Empowerment, engagement and perceived effectiveness in nursing work environments: Does experience matter? Journal of Nursing Management, 17: 636–646.

Murphy, P. R., & Jackson, S. E. (1999). Managing work role performance: Challenges for twenty-first-century organizations and employees. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation and development (325-365). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Niehoff, B. P., Enz, C. A., & Grover, R. A. (1990). The impact of top-management actions on employee attitudes and perceptions. Group and Organization Studies, 15, 337–352.

Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624.

Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652.

Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Berman, W. C., & Hedge, J. W. (2002). Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. Human Performance, 15, 299-323. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1504_01

Rousseau, V., & Aubé, C. (2020). Disentangling the relationship between empowering leader behaviors and adaptive performance in work teams. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(5), 761-777.

Sonnentag, S., Volmer, J., & Spychala, A. (2008). Job performance. The Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 1, 427-447.

Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology, 21(7), 600-619.

Shoss, M. K., Witt, L. A., & Vera, D. (2012). When does adaptive performance lead to higher task performance? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 910-924. doi:10.1002/job.780

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465.

Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 483–505.

Spiro, R. L., & Weitz, B. A. (1990). Adaptive selling: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 61– 69.

Saifullah, N., Scholar, M., Alam, M., 2015. Job satisfaction: A contest between human and organizational behavior. 7.

Scott, S., & Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580 – 628.

Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666 – 681.

Usmani, M., Sami, A., Baig, S,A., & Irfan, A. (2019). Chronological studies of lean and leadership for improvement of organizational performance. Journal of Public Value and Administration Insights, 2(2), 15-19.

Van Wingerden, J., Derks, D., & Bakker, A.B. (2018). Facilitating interns’ performance: the role of job resources, basic need satisfaction and work engagement. Career Development International, 23(4), 382-396.

Webster, J., Brown, G., Zweig, D., Connelly, C. E., Brodt, S., & Sitkin, S. (2008). Beyondknowledge sharing: Withholding knowledge at work. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Bingley, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301( 08)27001-5

Weitz, B. A., Sujan, H., & Sujan, M. (1986). Knowledge, motivation, and adaptive behavior: A framework for improving selling effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 50(10), 174 –191.

Yang, Q., Dan, W., Jing-Han, C., 2017. The Impact of Organizational Empowering Leadership Behavior on Individual Adaptive Performance: Cross-Level Mediation Effect of Organizational Psychological Empowerment. International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), 59–64.