Impact of Ambidextrous Leadership on organizational innovation through the moderation of organizational innovative climate and mediation of organizational social capital

Main Article Content

Asvir Naveed
Rizwan Qaiser Danish

Abstract

Purpose – The two constructs of ambidextrous leadership that are activities related to the opening of leader behavior and closing of leader behavior define the process of innovation at the organizational level. This paper aims to provide an insight into the relationship between ambidextrous leadership and Organizational innovation processes.


Design/methodology/approach – In this study, the research design will be cross-sectional, a total sample of 510 employees were used who rated the ambidextrous leader behaviors and organizational innovation performance concerning an innovation project.


Findings – Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis results showed that ambidextrous leadership is positively related to Organizational innovation performance. The relationship between ambidextrous leadership and organizational social capital is strengthened by an Organizational innovative climate, which in return increases organizational innovation.


Originality/value – The findings support the importance of opening and closing leader behaviors necessary for the process of innovation and therefore underline the significance of ambidexterity.


Keywords Ambidextrous leadership (AMBL), Organizational Innovation (OI), Organizational Social Capital (OSC), Organizational Innovative Climate (OIC).

Article Details

How to Cite
Asvir Naveed, & Danish, R. Q. . (2022). Impact of Ambidextrous Leadership on organizational innovation through the moderation of organizational innovative climate and mediation of organizational social capital. Journal of Public Value and Administrative Insight, 4(2), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.31580/jpvai.v4i2.2485
Section
Articles

References

Andrews, R., Boyne, G., & Mostafa, A. M. S. (2017). When bureaucracy matters for organizational performance: Exploring the benefits of administrative intensity in big and complex organizations. Public Administration, 95(1), 115-139.

Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305-337.

Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of management review, 27(4), 505-522.

Bormann, K. C., & Rowold, J. (2018). Construct proliferation in leadership style research: Reviewing pro and contra arguments. Organizational Psychology Review, 8(2-3), 149-173.

Bornay-Barrachina, M., López-Cabrales, A., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2017). How do employment relationships enhance firm innovation? The role of human and social capital. The InTernaTIonal Journal of human resource managemenT, 28(9), 1363-1391.

Breevaart, K., & Zacher, H. (2019). Main and interactive effects of weekly transformational and laissez‐faire leadership on followers’ trust in the leader and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(2), 384-409.

Camison, C., & Lopez, A. V. (2010). An examination of the relationship between manufacturing flexibility and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.

Carr, J.C., Cole, M.S., Ring, J.K. and Blettner, D.P. (2011), “A measure of variations in internal social capital among family firms”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 1207-1227

De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., Van Dijke, M., Schouten, B. C., & Bardes, M. (2009). When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers’ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 887.

Eisenbeiss, S. A., Van Knippenberg, D., & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: integrating team climate principles. Journal of applied psychology, 93(6), 1438.

Good, D., & Michel, E. J. (2013). Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts. The Journal of psychology, 147(5), 435-453.

Haroon, A., Sami, A., Rehman, S., Fahad, H., & Irfan, A. (2019). Sustainable Leadership Enhance Innovation : A systematic Review of Past Decade. Journal of Public Value and Administration Insights, 2(4), 1-5.

Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organization science, 17(3), 353-366.

Li, S., Jia, R., Juergen, H.S., Wang, X. and Luo, J. (2020), “Ambidextrous leadership and radical innovative capability: the moderating role of leader support”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 621-633.

Matteson, J. A., & Irving, J. A. (2006). Servant versus self-sacrificial leadership: A behavioral comparison of two follow-oriented leadership theories. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(1), 36-51.

Matteson, J. A., & Irving, J. A. (2006). Servant versus self-sacrificial leadership: A behavioral comparison of two follow-oriented leadership theories. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(1), 36-51.

Miron-Spektor, E., & Erez, M. (2017). Looking at creativity through a paradox lens (pp. 434-451). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mom, T. J., Fourné, S. P., & Jansen, J. J. (2015). Managers’ work experience, ambidexterity, and performance: The contingency role of the work context. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), s133-s153.

Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human resource management review, 10(3), 313-351.

Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The leadership quarterly, 13(6), 705-750.

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.

Önhon, Ö. (2019). The relationship between organizational climate for innovation and employees’ innovative work behavior: ICT sector in Turkey. Vezetéstudomány-Budapest Management Review, 50(11), 53-64.

Pastoriza, D., & Ariño, M. A. (2013). Does the ethical leadership of supervisors generate internal social capital?. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 1-12.

Pastoriza, D., Arino, M. A., & Ricart, J. E. (2008). Ethical managerial behaviour as an antecedent of organizational social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 329-341.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Competitive Intelligence Review, 1(1), 14-14.

Porter, M.E. (1990), “The competitive advantage of nations”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68 No. 2, pp. 73-93.

Rehman, S., Sami, A., Haroon, A., & Irfan, A. (2019). Impact of Sustainable Leadership Practices on Public Sector Organization: A systematic Review of Past Decade. Journal of Public Value and Administration Insights, 2(3), 1-5.

Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of business Venturing, 26(4), 441-457.

Rosing, K., & Zacher, H. (2017). Individual ambidexterity: the duality of exploration and exploitation and its relationship with innovative performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(5), 694-709.

Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The leadership quarterly, 22(5), 956-974.

Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130-147.

Sami, A., Jusoh, A., & Qureshi, M. I. (2016). Does Ethical Leadership Create Public Value? Empirical Evidences from Banking Sector of Pakistan. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(4S). 262-270

Sami, A., Jusoh, A., Mahfar, M., Qureshi, M. I., & Khan, M. M. (2016). Role of Ethical Culture in Creating Public Value. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(4S). 255-261

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607.

Setini, M., Yasa, N., Supartha, I., & Giantari, I. G. A. K. (2021). The effects of knowledge sharing, social capital and innovation on marketing performance. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 5(3), 257-266.

Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Van der Heijden, B. I., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of vocational behavior, 100, 67-77.

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.

Usmani, M., Sami, A., Baig, S,A., & Irfan, A. (2019). Chronological studies of lean and leadership for improvement of organizational performance. Journal of Public Value and Administration Insights, 2(2), 15-19.

Van Knippenberg, D., & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?. Academy of management Annals, 7(1), 1-60.

Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 115(2), 204-213.

Wayne, S. J., & Green, S. A. (1993). The effects of leader-member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behavior. Human relations, 46(12), 1431-1440.

West, M. A. and Farr, J. L. 1990. Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, Chichester: Wiley.

Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The leadership quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.

Zacher, H., & Rosing, K. (2015). Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.

Zacher, H., & Wilden, R. G. (2014). A daily diary study on ambidextrous leadership and self‐reported employee innovation. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 87(4), 813-820.

Zacher, H., Robinson, A. J., & Rosing, K. (2016). Ambidextrous leadership and employees' self‐reported innovative performance: The role of exploration and exploitation behaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(1), 24-46.

Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of management journal, 53(1), 107-128.