Reflective teaching strategy on students achievement and interest in basic technology

Main Article Content

Abdullahi Muhammad Hassan
Ombuguhim S. U
Alhassan, N. U
Ahmed, T.A


The design for this study was quasi experimental, specifically the non-randomized control group pretest posttest design involving two groups – the control group and experimental group was used in this study. 6125 (JSS III) students who are offering Basic Technology in Minna Educational zone formed the population of this study. 241 Junior Secondary three (JSS III) students of two co-educational schools offering Basic Technology were sampled. The two-co-educational secondary schools were randomly drawn using balloting from four co-educational schools offering Basic Technology in Minna educational zone. Two intact classes were used for the study. In each of the sampled schools, all the JSS III students in the intact class randomly selected belonged to one group either the experimental (RTS) or control (TAT) group and thus received the same treatment. Basic Technology Achievement Test (BTAT) and the Basic Technology Interest Inventory (BTII), were developed and validated. An internal reliability consistency of BTAT was found to be 0.75 using Kuder Richardson formula 20(K – R20) and that of BTII was 0.85 using Cronbach Alpha. The BTAT and BTII were administered as pretest to the two groups. Mean and Standard Deviation was used to analyzed research questions; while analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used in testing the hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The result of the analyses indicated that the effect of RTS on students’ achievement and interest in Basic Technology was significant and gender was not a significant factor on students’ academic achievement and interest in Basic Technology among others.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hassan, A. M., Ombuguhim S. U, Alhassan, N. U, & Ahmed, T.A. (2021). Reflective teaching strategy on students achievement and interest in basic technology. Journal of Public Value and Administrative Insight, 4(1), 37–44.


Agbaegbu, C.N. (2011). Effects of peer assessment techniques on students academic achievement and Interest in Geography. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Akudolu, L.I. (2013). Effect of Computer-assisted Instruction on the Learning of Basic Technology. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Anderson, R.C. Shirely, L.L., Wilson, P.T.& Fielding, L.G. (2008). Interestingness of children’s Reading Materials. In R.E. Snow & J.F. Marshall (Eds). Aptitude, learning and Instruction. 3 Hillsaade: Lawrence Elbaum associates. Inc.

Anekwe, J.U. (2016). Effects of Constructivist-Based Instructional Model on Students’ Interest and Academic Achievement in Basic Technology in Anambra State. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis. University of Port Harcourt.

Bhatti, M. N., Sami, A., & Qureshi, I. (20l8). Personality and academic performance among graduate students. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 2(3), 256-259.

Harding, J. (2012). Science and technology: A future for women. UNESCO Paper to World Conference to Review and Appraise the Achievement of Women. UN Decade for Centre.

Ifeakor, A.C. (2012). Effects of Peer Assessment on Students’ Academic Achievement and Interest in Chemistry. Unpublished M.Ed Thesis: University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Laraib, Sami, A., & Irfan, A. (2020). Academic Achievement of college students based on Co- curricular Activities. Journal of Management Info, 7(l), l6-23

Oboh, L.U. (2008). Methodologies in Communicative Skills. Implications of Class Size, Peer Assessment and Team Teaching. In Otagburuagu (Ed). Common Frontiers in Communication Skills. Focus on the Nigerian University System. Kano: Global Links Communications.

Offorma, G.C. (2010). Impact of Teachers’ use of Resources on Secondary School Students’ Learning Outcomes in Basic Technology. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis. University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Olikeze, F.C. (2009). Effect of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Secondary School students’ Cognitive Achievement and Interest in Biology. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis. University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Onwubiko, J.U. (2011). Effect of Student-Centred and Teacher-Centred Approaches in Teaching on Achievement in Basic Technology. Unpublished M.Ed Thesis: University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Gatumu, J.C. (2016). Reflective Teaching published under the conditions of the creative commons, Kenya. From

Kalijah, T. (2017). Education Training and career in Physics for women in Malaysia in PAP International Conference on women in physics UNESCO Paris France.

Nwagbo, C. (2012). Level of scientific literacy of secondary school science students’ implication for sustainable development in Nigeria. Proceeding of 43rd annual conference and inaugural conference of CASTME Africa: 73-77.

Obiageli, E. (2016). Federal Government of Nigeria. Keynote address delivered by Honorable Minister of Education at the opening ceremony of the 22nd annual conference/Workshop of the Nigeria institute of science/Laboratory Technology held in Abuja titled “Science and Technology for Youth Empowerment”. From http//www.nislt. 20paper.doc

Obioma, G. (2017). The nine year basic education curriculum: Structure, content and strategy for implementation. Nigeria Experience in educational reform. NERDC. From http//

Ogunleye, H. (2013). Circle Perception of Strategies for improving low enrolment, under achievement and attitude of girls in Physics at senior secondary school level 42nd annual conference proceeding of STAN.

Olagunju, A.M., Adesoji,F.A., Iroegbu, T.O., and Ige, T.A. (2013). Innovation in science teaching for the new millennium. Innovation in theory and practice. Eds. Oluremi Bamisaye. Macmillan publisher Nigeria.

Opara, M.F. (2014). Braking gender barriers through instructional process. Journal of science teacher association of Nigeria. Gender STM education Series no 1.

Rudraiah, A.M. (2015). Reflection in Education: From research to practice. In Penny, A.J., Harvey, K.L., and Jessop, T.S. 1996.

XU, Q. (2018). Reflective Teaching an Effective Path for English Foreign Language Teacher’s Professional Development. Canadian Social Science 5.2: 35-40.