The social studies learning outcomes in reciprocal teaching and direct instruction at primary teacher education student

research highlights, research objectives, methodogy, results, findings, references

Authors

  • muhamad Abas Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Etin Solihatin Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Nadiroh Nadiroh Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Nadiroh Nadiroh Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31580/apss.v4i2.762

Keywords:

social studies

Abstract

the study examines the effect of reciprocal and direct instruction models on the learning outcomes at halu oleo university students. The results showes that the reciprocal instruction models was more effective in improving students social studies learning outcomes than direct learning. this study uses quasi-experiment with post-test control group design. the result of the study used descriptive and inferential analysis. The hypothesis testing use anova with LSD test. normality test using kolmogorov smirnov test and homogeneity test uses the levene test.       

References

Aminant Aderonke Agoro dan MK. Akinsola (2013). “effectiveness of reflective reciprocal teaching on pre-
service teachers achievement and science process skils in integrated science” International Journal of Education
and Research, Vol. 1, (8), No. pp.1-20.
Borich, Gari D. (2017). Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice. 9 th editions. Boston: Pearson.
Doolittle, Peter E., Triplett Hicks D, Nichols C.F., W.D., & Carl A Young, (2012). Reciprocal Teaching
for Reading Comprehension in Higher Education: A Strategy for Fostering the Deeper Understanding of
Texts. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17 (2), 2012.
http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/.
Mayer, R. E., & Alexander, P. A. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of research on learning and instruction. Taylor &
Francis.
Susanto, A. (2014). Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPS di SD. Kencana.
Zendler, A., & Reile, S. (2018). The effect of reciprocal teaching and programmed instruction on learning
outcome in computer science education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58(May), 132–144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc. 2018.05.008

Downloads

Published

2019-04-22