Cities and Culture: The Case for Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Era of Super-diversity

Main Article Content

Rachel Suet Kay Chan

Abstract

Research Highlights
In the quest to develop cities for the long run, the debate is whether to retain elements of culture or to reinvent such spaces for new uses. Cultural heritage preservation thus becomes an issue in urban planning, particularly in developing countries including Malaysia (Mohd Shakir Tamjes et al, 2017). Scholars mention that Kuala Lumpur needs to create a distinctive city identity and image if it is to achieve its bigger goal of becoming a World-Class City by 2020 (Mohamad Asri Ibrahim et al, 2017).
A question raised by researchers is whether the policies to safeguard heritage buildings in Kuala Lumpur is comparable to the practices in UNESCO heritage sites such as Malacca and Georgetown (Mohd Shakir Tamjes et al, 2017). Through participant observation, combining focus group discussions, content analysis, photography, and videography, I outline how the preservation of one particular historical building, a Chinese clan association, increases the cultural value of the city’s surroundings in Kuala Lumpur, as well as being a major tourist attraction. This makes the case for the continued retention of historical buildings and practices, despite overarching social changes such as super-diversity (Vertovec, 2007).


Research Objectives


This paper makes the case for preserving a particular heritage building, namely the Chan See Shu Yuen Clan Association Kuala Lumpur & Selangor (CSSYKL), a clan association, pre-war historical site, and tourist attraction.


Methodology


How does the preservation of CSSYKL increase the cultural value of the city’s surroundings in Kuala Lumpur? This research question is answered through fieldwork by the project leader through participant observation which included photography, videography, content analysis of secondary documents, and focus group discussions with clan leaders and members. Photographic evidence is provided to argue for the case of enriching place attachment through the retention of meaning for inhabitants of Kuala Lumpur, due to the special nature it possesses. For example, Monnet (2014) conducted a photoethnography of urban space in the form of a multimedia essay, referring to the “production of data†rather than the “collection of dataâ€. Monnet (2014) explained that images and sounds allow for attentive observation of the smallest details of daily life, and that the ethnographer experientially chooses to interpret and define what should be recorded in their photography - hence the “production of dataâ€. This renders photographic evidence the best form of data for the case of cultural heritage preservation within the urban. Photographs were also harvested from stills captured in Google Maps under the Street View, where the journey was screen captured using Game DVR, a software which comes enclosed with Microsoft Windows 10.


Results


The photographic evidence shows how the preservation of cultural heritage buildings add character to the presence of Kuala Lumpur Chinatown, or Petaling Street. In the case of CSSYKL, it provides the historical elements as well as familiarity given its longstanding association with Kuala Lumpur’s history, and thus evokes the symbolic aesthetic. It provides symbolic aesthetic meaning to the future of Kuala Lumpur’s development and enriches the local cultural expression in league with the Malaysian National Cultural Policy. Ultimately, it guarantees that no matter how developed or industrialised Kuala Lumpur is, what with the move into the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Internet of Things, there will still be cultural meaning and place attachment resonant within the heart and soul of Kuala Lumpur. Even in the face of super-diversity, the clan association building will still reinvent itself as a place of attachment not only to those of Chinese descent but to all who are interested to appreciate its value.


Findings


Chan See Shu Yuen Clan Association Kuala Lumpur & Selangor (CSSYKL) is one example of a historical building which functioned not only in the past as a community centre for the Chinese who migrated to Malaya in search of economic opportunity, but still retains its functions today as a gateway to maintaining links with Mainland China, especially in the economic dimension. Simultaneously, the heritage building also attracts tourists from all around the world, including those from China and local tourists themselves.


Acknowledgement


This research work is supported by the Ministry of Education of Malaysia under Grant Number FRGS/1/2018/WAB12/UKM/02/1 (Superdiversity Networks: Cantonese Clan Associations in Malaysia as Transnational Social Support System).


 


 

Article Details

Section

References

Acs, Z.J. & Dana, L.P. (2000). Contrasting Two Models of Wealth Redistribution. Small Business Economics 16, 63–74.
Askari, A. H. & Kamariah Binti Dola (2009). Influence of building façade visual elements on its historical image: Case of Kuala Lumpur city, Malaysia. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 5(1), 29-40.
Azhari, N. F. N., & Mohamed, E. (2012). Public perception: heritage building conservation in Kuala Lumpur. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 271-279.
Cardosa, E. Heritage of Malaysia Trust Executive Director. Travel Times, 29 March – 4 April 2002.
Chan, S.C. (2003). Interpreting Chinese Tradition: A Clansmen Organisation in Singapore. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 5(1), 72-90.
Chan, R.S.K. (2018). Super-diversity and the Intersectionality of Urban Spikiness. Towards Livable, Resilient, & Competitive Cities International Conference, 2-3 October 2018, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Chan She Shu Yuen Clan Association, Kuala Lumpur & Selangor. http://cssykl.com/
Chan She Shu Yuen Clan Association. (2016). Glory Days Relived: 120 Years of Chan She Shu Yuen. Kuala Lumpur: Chan She Shu Yuen Clan Association.
Cheng, E.W., Li, A.H., & Ma, S. (2013). Resistance, Engagement, and Heritage Conservation by Voluntary Sector: The Case of Penang in Malaysia. Modern Asian Studies 48(3), 617–644.
Chia, J. (2014). A Review of the Centre for Malaysian Chinese Studies Library (馬來西亞華社研究中心), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ch’ng C.L.D. (1995). Sukses Bisnis Cina Perantauan. Latar Belakang, Praktek Bisnis dan Jaringan Internasional. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Dana, L.P. Etemad, H. & Wright, R.W. (2000). The global reach of symbiotic networks. In
Dana, LP. (Ed.) Global Marketing Co-operation and Networks. Binghamton, NY: International Business Press, 1-16.
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2014). Report on Characteristics of Household, 1–12.
Dick, H. W. & Rimmer, P. J. (1998). Beyond the third world city: the new urban geography of South-east Asia. Urban Studies, 35(12), 2303-2321.
Ember, M., Ember, C. R. & Skoggard, I. (Eds.). (2004). Encyclopedia of Diasporas: Immigrant and Refugee Cultures Around the World. Volume I: Overviews and Topics; Volume II: Diaspora Communities. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Eyeing Belt and Road business. (2017). Malaysian Chinese Association. http://www.mca.org.my/2/Content/SinglePage?_param1=13-0 82017-153499-08-201713&_param2=TS 30 January 2018.
Feilden, B. M. (1994). Conservation of Historic Buildings. Oxford; Boston: Butterworth Architecture.
Hadi, A. S., Idrus, S., Shah, A. H. H. & Mohamed, A. F. (2010). Malaysian urbanization transition: From nascent, pseudo to livable mega-urban region. Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management, 11(1), 3-13.
Hashim, A. E., Aksah, H. & Said, S. Y. (2012). Functional assessment through post occupancy review on refurbished historical public building in Kuala Lumpur. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 330-340.
Hirschman, C. (1976). Recent urbanization trends in Peninsular Malaysia. Demography, 13(4), 445-461.
Ho, C. S. (2008). Urban governance and rapid urbanization issues in Malaysia. Jurnal Alam Bina, 13(4), 1-24.
Idid, S.Z.A (1995). Pemeliharaan warisan rupa bandar. Kuala Lumpur: Badan Warisan Malaysia.
Light, I. (1972). Ethnic Enterprise in America: Business and Welfare among Chinese, Japanese, and Blacks. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Loewen, J.W. (1971). The Mississippi Chinese: Between Black and White. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Long D. G. & Han Q. M. (2008). Re-generating the cultural identity and social network abroad. Cambridge Journal of China Studies 9(1), 35-47.
Ma S. M. (2012). Cantonese sojourners and Shiwan ceramic roof decoration in Malaysia. Journal of Chinese Overseas 8 (2012), 38-81.
Masron, T., Yaakob, U., Ayob, N. M., & Mokhtar, A. S. (2017). Population and spatial distribution of urbanisation in Peninsular Malaysia 1957-2000. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 8(2), 20-29.
Malaysia Tourism Centre. (2017). Launching KL Must Visit Attractions Trail Card (19
Oktober 2017) http://www.matic.gov.my/en/information/gallery/photo/291-launching-kl
must-visit-attractions-trail-card-19-oktober-2017
Mariana Makmur. (2018). The Chinese Clan Associations in Padang: A package of the ethnic tradition and the social-culture change in the era of globalization. Friendly City 4 ‘From Research to Implementation for Better Sustainability’ IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 126.
McGee, T. (2017). Managing and planning for urban sustainability in Malaysia: challenges for the twenty first century. International Conference on Sustainable Cities, Communities, and Partnerships for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 10 October 2017.
Mohamad Asri Ibrahim, Mohammad Hussaini Wahab, Mohamad Shahryzee Shukri, and Mohd Rifzal Mohd Sharif (2017). Regenerating Pudu marketplace and urban identity. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Technology, UTM Razak School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 10 October 2017.
Mohd Shakir Tamjes, Wan Nurul Mardiah Wan Mohd Rani, Mohammad Hussaini Wahab, Rohayah Che Amat, Syuhaida Ismail. (2017). Governance of urban heritage – a review on adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Technology, UTM Razak School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 10 October 2017.
Monnet, N. (2014). Photoethnography of the urban space, or how to describe the urban world beyond the words: presentation of a multimedia essay. Visual Ethnography, 3(1), 35-64.
Nasar, J. L. (1994). Urban design aesthetics: The evaluative qualities of building exteriors. Environment and behavior, 26(3), 377-401.
Ng C.K. (2002). An Outline of the Recent Development of Clan Associations in Singapore. http://www.ihakka.net/DOC/An%20Outline%20of%20the%20Recent%20Development%20of%20Clan%20Associations%20in%20Singapore-%E5%90%B3%E6%8C%AF%E5%
Ooi, K.G. (2015). Disparate identities: Penang from a historical perspective, 1780-1941. Kajian Malaysia, 33(2): 27-52.
Overseas Chinese in the British Empire. Chan Sow Lin. http://overseaschineseinthebritishempire.blogspot.my/2011/12/chan-sow-li n.html
Purcell, V. (1967). The Chinese in Malaya. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
Roda, J.M and Ismariah Ahmad. (2010). From the “Surat Sungai” to the world timber markets:
the role of Malaysian Chinese transnational firms in the local, regional, and global
integration. http://agritrop.cirad.fr/564678/1/document_564678.pdf
Rose, G. (2014). Visual culture, photography and the urban: An interpretive framework. Space and Culture, 2(3), 4-13.
Shuid, S. (2004). Urbanization and housing in Kuala Lumpur city centre: issues and future challenges. Proceedings of the 19th EAROPH World Planning and Housing Congress 2004, Melbourne, Australia, 19 – 22 April 2004.
Sun, W. (2005). Media and the Chinese diaspora: Community, consumption, and transnational imagination. Journal of Chinese Overseas, 1(1), 65-86.
Ujang, N. (2014). Place meaning and significance of the traditional shopping district in the city centre of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 8(1), 66-77.
Tan, S. K., Tan, S. H., Kok, Y. S. & Choon, S. W. (2018). Sense of place and sustainability
of intangible cultural heritage–The case of George Town and Melaka. Tourism Management, 67, 376-387.
Think City's big plans to help transform KL into a world-class city. 25 January 2017. Invest KL. http://www.investkl.gov.my/Relevant_News-@-Think_Citys_big_plans_to_help_transform_KL_into_a_world-class_city.aspx
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(6), 1024-1054.
Wong, B. (1987). The role of ethnicity in enclave entrepreneurs: a study of the Chinese garment factory in New York City. Human Organization, 66(2), 120-30.
Yaakob, U., Masron, T., & Masami, F. (2010). Ninety years of urbanization in Malaysia: a geographical investigation of its trends and characteristics. J Ritsumeikan Soc Sci Humanit, 4(3), 79-101.
Yen, C.H. (1981). Early Chinese clan organizations in Singapore and Malaya, 1819–1911. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 12(1), 62-91.
Yusoff, N. A. H., Noor, A. M., & Ghazali, R. (2014). City skyline conservation: sustaining the premier image of Kuala Lumpur. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 583-592.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.