Design and Development of Teachers' Metacognitive Skills Training Module in Teaching and Application Of 21st Century Basic Skills
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Teachers were found to have insufficient knowledge and skills in applying 21st century basic skills in student-centered teaching approach and the teachers’ metacognitive skills was at low level. Based on these problems, teachers development needs to be implemented by developing appropriate training module. Therefore, the design and development research are conducted to address existing problems. This study involves the development and evaluation of the module validity. The development of module based on the need analysis, theory, model, and related literature review. Based on the need analysis, the constructivism learning theory, the 21st century skills model and metacognition theory are taken into account in drafting the module. The questionnaire of the module validity was developed based on a Likert scale of ten points: (0) strongly disagreed, until (10) strongly agree. The questionnaire was initiated before being submitted to six field experts. This study produced a module consisting of two parts: (A) Introduction, Theoretical Basis and Training Session Objectives, and (B) Procedures of 7 Training Sessions. The field experts find that this module has a good validity. This study suggests that the teachers’ metacognitive skills training module in the teaching and application of 21st century basic skills can be used in the context of actual training in the next phase.
Article Details
References
Bachtiar, S. (2015). Persepsi Guru Sman Jeneponto Terhadap Problem Based Learning (Pbl), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Motivasi, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dan Metakognitif. Makalah diseminarkan pada Seminar Nasional FMIPA Biologi UM 16-17 Oktober 2015.
Bank Negara Annual Report. (2016).
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
DeWitt, D. (2010). Development of collaborative mLearning module on nutrition for form two students. Tesis doktor falsafah. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Malaya.
Doganay, A., & Demir, O. (2011). Comparison of the level of using metacognitive strategies during study between high achieving and low achieving prospective teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 2036-2043.
Efendi, N. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Dipadukan dengan Think Pair Share terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Metakognitif Belajar Biologi Siswa SMA Berkemampuan Akademik Berbeda di Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan 3 (2) Julai 2013.
Eow, Y. L., Roaini, J., Zakri, M. D., & Asmah, A. H. (2015). Pasukan Pembimbing SIPartner+ dan SISC+ Memangkin Pendifusian Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Alaf Baru Berpandukan Teori Apresiatif Inkuiri.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W. & Keller, M. J. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Edisi ke-5. USA: Thompson Wadsmorth.
Hammond, D., Austin, K., Orcutt, S., & Rosso, J. (2001). The Learning Classroom: Theory into Practice A Telecourse for Teacher Education and Professional Development. Stanford University School of Education.
Hargrove, R. (2013). Assessing the long-term impact of a metacognitive approach to creative skill development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 489-517. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9200-6.