An Investigation IFRS Adoption in Malaysia on The Relationship between The Audit Committee and Quality of Financial Statement

Main Article Content

Citrawati Jatiningrum
Fauzi Fauzi
Rita Irviani
Mujiyati Mujiyati
Shahanif Hasan

Abstract

Audit committees are one of Corporate Governance (CG) mechanisms which are the significant factor in improving its role in inhibiting financial statement fraud (Choi, Jeon & Park, 2004; Habbash, 2010; Soliman & Ragab, 2014). Quality of the Financial Statement emphasised as being in compliance with accounting standards accepted in general, the disclosure scale, and reported numbers although this is not merely a task for the IFRS (Cascino & Gassen, 2010). In recent years, the issue of IFRS adoption in developed and developing countries have been a great deal of attention from many researchers. However, regarding the relationship between the Audit Committee and Quality of Financial Statement with IFRS requirements is still questioning. In fact, the results obtained from some previous researches are inconsistent. Therefore, the objectives in this study are aims to investigate whether post the mandatory IFRS adoption in Malaysia would limit earnings management practice in highlights of governance monitoring on the quality of financial reporting in this environment. This paper gives some evidence: 1) The effect of pre- and post IFRS adoption in Malaysia in the relationship between the Audit Committee and earnings management adoption. 2) examine the differences of the level earnings management on two periods of IFRS adoption in Malaysia. Quality of Financial statement in this study was measured by the level of earnings management with discretional accrual (DA) proxy. The audit committee variable measured by Audit Committee Independence (ACIND), Audit Committee Financial Expertise (ACFEX), Audit Committee Meeting (ACMEET), Audit Committee Size (ACSIZE) and control variable in this study using Board Size (BRDSIZE) and Firm Leverage (FRMLEV). The sample of this study including the two main time periods, there are pre-IFRS adoption and post-IFRS adoption. Using 81 listed companies in Malaysia as a sample, with 567 observations is analysed from 2009 to 2015 (7 years observations) with purposive judgement sampling selection. For seven years, a total of 567 observations is analysed. The pre- IFRS adoption period was tested from 2009 through 2011, and the post-IFRS adoption was tested from 2012 through the end of 2015. The findings in this study with multiplied regression analysis revealed that the hypothesis test in a period of pre- and post IFRS adoption ACFEX and FIRMLEV statistically were significance at 5% level. It means that Audit Committee Financial Expertise (ACFEX) have a significant effect on earnings management practise. According to the result found in the post IFRS adoption period, Audit Committee Meeting (ACMEET) is significant. It means that the frequency of audit committee meetings could be decreasing the level of discretionary accrual. The evidence also unveils both of ACIND and ACSIZE at 5 % level p-value is not significant. The most important result finding on pre- and post period of IFRS adoption in Malaysia provide evidence that based on the statistically significant was upward or the relation more significantly. However, this study also reported with paired sampled test analysis there was no significant difference between the level of earnings management in pre- and post period the adoption of IFRS in Malaysia at 5% level significance. 


An important contribution this study has the impact on practices and has implications useful for regulators. The study provides empirical evidence that a relationship between the audit committee and earnings management in the case of IFRS adoption. In contributing to the strength of governance quality and FRQ need to be revisited, especially after mandatory IFRS adoption. Though the audit committee and audit quality are implicitly mentioned in the CG act, it is recommended that formulates specific rules relating to the quality of Financial Reporting. In this regard, it is suggested that company reports would be presented high quality in financial reporting to provide appropriate responses to recommendations made in the reports. Finally, these findings suggest that CG practices in Malaysian that have its own peculiar characteristics compared to other emerging economies.    


 

Article Details

Section

References

Abdullah, S. N. (2004). Accrual management and the independence of the boards of directors and Audit committees. Internal Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 12(1), 49-82.

Abed, S., Al-Attar, A., & Suwaidan, M. (2012). Corporate governance and earnings management: Jordanian Evidence. International Business Research, 5(1), 212-22.

Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23, 69-87.

Adams & Mehran, H. (2011). Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, no. 330. June 2008; revised October 2011. JEL classification.

Ahmed, A. S., Neel, M. & Wang, D. (2013). Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve accounting quality? Preliminary evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1344-1372.

Al Momani, A. M., & Obeidat, I. M. (2013). Activating the role of audit committees and board of directors in restricting earnings management practices: a perspectives of auditors in jordan. International Journal of management and Business Research, 3(2), 175-190.

Ali. R, Shuhidan. S. H., &Adnan. N. L (2015). audit committee composition and auditor

reporting: a Malaysian case. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci., 4(10S), 74-81.

Alkadi, H., Khalifa, H., & Hanefah, M. M. (2012). Audit Committee characteristics and earning management in Malaysian shariah-compliant companies. Bussiness & Management Review, 2(2), 52-61.

Alves, S. (2013). Ownership Structure and Earnings management: Evidence from Portugal.

Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 6(1), 57-73.

Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R. & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467-498.

Baxter, P., & Cotter, J. (2009). Audit committees and earnings quality. Accounting & Finance, 49(2), 267-290, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1407300 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2008.00290.x

Beasly, M. S., Carcllo, J. V., Hermanson, D. R. & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial

Reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horisons, 14(4), 441-454.

Becker, C. L., Defond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J. & Subramanyam, K.R. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research. 15(1); 1-24.

Bedard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise,

Independence and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 13-35.

Brochet, F., Jagolinzer A., & Riedl, E. J. (2013). Mandatory IFRS Adoption and Financial Statement Comparability. Contemporary Accounting Research. 30, 1373-1400.

Cascino, S., & Gassen, J. (2010). Mandatory IFRS Adoption an Accounting Comparability, Humboldt, University, Collaborative Research Centre: Discussion Paper 649.

Chang, J. C., & Sun, h. L. (2009). Crossed-listed foreign firms’ earnings in formativeness,

earnings Management and disclosure of corporate governance information under SOX. The International Journal of Accounting, 44(1), 1-32. Doi: 10.1016/j.intacc.2008.12.004

Chen, H., Tang, Q., Jiang, Y., & Lin, Z. (2010). The role of international financial reporting standards in accounting quality: evidence from the European Union. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting. 21(3), 220-278.

Chen, K. Y., & Zhou, J. (2007), Audit Committee, Board Characteristics, and Auditor Switch Decisions by Andersen’s Client. Contemporary Accounting Research. 24(4), 1085-1117.

Chen, X., Harford, J., Li, K., (2005). Monitoring: Which institutions matter? University of British Columbia. Working Paper, July.

Cheung, Stephen Y.L and Chan, Bob Y., 2004, Corporate Governance in Asia. Asia-Pacific Development Journal Vol. 11, No. 2, December 2004

Choi, J. H., Jeon, K. A., & Park, J. I. (2004). The role of audit committees in decreasing earnings management: Korean evidence. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 1(1), 37-60.

Chtourou S. M., Bedrar, J., & Courteau, L. (2001). Corporate governance and earnings management. Working Paper Universite Laval, Quebec City, Canada.

Chua, Y. L., Cheong, C, S and Goul, G. (2012). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on accounting quality: evidence from Australia Journal of International Accounting Research, 11(1), 119-146. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/jiar-10212

Dechow, P. M., & Skinner, D. J. (2000). Earnings Management: Reconciling the views of

accounting, academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14(2), 235 250.

Dechow, P. M., Hutton, A. P., Kim, J. H., & Sloan, R. G. (2012). Detecting earnings management: A new approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(2), 275-333.

Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193-225.

Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings Manipulation: An analysis of firm subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1-36.

De Fond, M. L. & Park, C. W. (1997). Smoothing Income in Anticipation of Future Earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23, 115-139.

De fond, M. L. & J. Jiambalvo. (1991). Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors. The Accounting Review, 66(3), 643-655.

Defond, M. L. & Jiambalvo, J. (1991). The Effect of Audit Quality On Earnings Management. Accounting review, 643-655,

Defond, M. L. & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt Covenant Violation and Manipulation of Accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 145-176.

DeFond, M. L., & Francis, J. R. (2005). Audit Research after Sarbanes-Oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 24(s-1), 5-30. doi:10.2308/aud.2005.24.s-1.5.

Fan, J. P. H., & Wong, T. J. (2002). Corporate ownership structure and the in formativeness of Accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of accounting and economics, 33(3), 401–425. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101 (02)00047-2

Ferentinou, A. C., & Anagnostopoulou, S. C. (2014). Accrual-based and real earnings management before and after IFRS adoption. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 17(1), 1-23. doi 10.1108/jaar-01-2014-0009

Habbash, M. (2010). The effectiveness of corporate governance and external audit on

constraining Earnings management practice in the UK. Durham University.

Habbash, M., Sindezingue, C., & Salama, A. (2013). The effect of audit committee characteristics on earning management. evidence from United Kingdom. International Journal 0f Disclosure and Governance, 10(1), 13-38.

Hamdan, A. M. M., Mushtaha, S. M. S., & Al-Sartawi, A. A. M. (2013). The audit committee characteristics and earning quality: evidence from Jordan. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 7(4), 51-80.

Hasan, S. B. (2017). The moderating effect of audit quality on audit committeand financial reporting quality in Malaysia. Unpublish UUM Thesis.

Hashim, H. A., & Devi, S. (2008). Board characteristics, ownership structure and earnings quality: Malaysian evidence. Elsevier, 8. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3563 (08)08004-3

Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of accounting and economics, 31(1-3), 405-440.

Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its Implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365-383.

Inaam, Z. & Khamoussi, H. (2016). Audit committee effectiveness, audit quality and earnings management: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Law and Management. 58(2), 179-196. doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2015-0006

Jaggi, B., Leung, S., & Gulf. (2009). Family control, board independence and earnings

Management: Evidence based on Hong Kong firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(4), 281-300.

Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35, 375-400.

Lin, J. W., & Li, J. F. & Yang, J. S. (2006). The effect of audit committee performance on

earning quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(9) 921-933.

Mohamad, M. H. S., Rashid, H. M. A., & Shawtari, F. A. M. (2012). Corporate governance and earnings management in malaysian government linked companies: the impact of glcs’ transformation policy. Asian review of Accounting, 20(3), 241-258.

Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2007) Determinants of Audit Committee Diligence. Accounting Horizons, 21(3), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2007.21.3.265

Rahman, R. A., & Ali, F. H. M. (2006). Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7), 783–804. http://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610680549

Rahman, R. A., & Haniffa, R. M. (2005). The effect of role duality on corporate performance in Malaysia. corporate ownership and control, 2(2), 40-47.

Rahman, R. A., Ali, F. H. M. (2006). Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian Evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7), 783-804.

Salleh, N., & Haat, M. (2014). Audit committee and earnings management: pre and post MCCG. International Review of Management and Business Research, 3(1), 305-318.

Schipper, K. (1989). Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons, 3(4), 91-102.

Scott, W. R. (2000). Financial Accounting Theory. Second Edition. Prentice Hall: Kanada.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research methods for business – A skill building approach, 6th Edition. West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-1-119-94225-2.

Sharma, V. D., & Kuang, C. (2014). Voluntary Audit Committee Characteristics, Incentives, and Aggressive Earnings Management: Evidence from New Zealand. Published online-early in the International Journal of Auditing, 18 (1), 76-89

Sharma, V. D., Sharma, D. S., & Ananthanarayanan, U. (2011). Client importance and earnings management: the moderating role of audit committees. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 125–156. http://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10111

Soliman, M. M., & Ragab, A. A. (2014). Audit committee effectiveness, audit quality and earning management: an empirical study of the listed companies in Eygpt. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(2), 155-166.

Vicknair, D., & Hickman, K., Carnes, K., C. (1993). A note on audit committee independence: evidence from the NYSE on Grey Area Directors. Accounting Horisons, 7(1), 53-57.

Wan Abdullah, W., R., Maruhun, E., N., S, & Tarmizi, M., A. (2017). The Adoption of IFRS and Earnings Management: Evidence from the Construction Industry in Malaysia. Global Conference on Business and Economics Research (GCBER) 2017. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia. 405-412.

Wan-Hussin, W. N., & Haji-Abdullah, N. M. (2009). Audit committee attributes, financial

distress And the quality of financial reporting in Malaysia. Unpublished working paper. Universiti Teknologi Mara. Retrieve November, 10, 2010.

Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J.L. (1979). The Demand for and Supply Accounting Theories: The

Xie, B., Davidson III, W. N, & DaDalt, P.J (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295-316.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.