The Influence of IPMS and Innovation Type on Firm Performance
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study proposed two hypothesis and results indicated that no relationship between the interactive use of performance measurement systems (IPMS and firm performance. Inconsistency with previous research, while use of IPMS at the middle and lower level in order day to day employee activities can be active and improved of employees motivation would be meeting to target (Grafton, et al., 2010, and Hall, 2008). Top management in kinds of consistency and attentions for the midle and lower level staff would seriously developed and implementation rewards and funishment policy if subordinate meeting or not to target. Would like interact that’s in the organization if the innovation type orientation would be implementation?. Top management certaint to be if innovation type (e.g; product/service, process, position, and paradigm innovations) in the Local-Owned Enterprise Jabar Provine can be encourage employees motivations, creation and improve value added any way create organizational goals, and the end improve performance or public services, and kindly increase firm performance (see also Ting, et al., 2013; Uzkurt, et al., 2013; and Kalkan, et al., 2014)
Article Details
References
Dahlan, M. (2017). Moderating effect of usefulness management accounting system on the relationship between innovation and firm performance: evidence from Bandung District, West Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(25): pp. 179-188.
Grafton, J., Lillis, A. M. and Widener, S. K. (2010). The role of performance measurement and evaluation in building organizational capabilities and performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35 (7): pp. 689-706.
Hall, M. (2008). The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33 (2-3): pp. 141-163.
Hyvönen, J. (2007). Strategy, performance measurement techniques and information technology of the firm and their links to organizational performance. Management Accounting Research, 18 (3): pp. 343-366
Kaiser, H. F. and Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 34: pp. 111-117.
Kalkan, A., Bozkurt, O. C., and Arman, M. (2014), The impact of intellectual capital, innovation and organizational strategy on firm performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150: 700-707.
Lau, C. M., and Sholihin, M. (2005). Financial and nonfinancial performance measures: How do they affect job satisfaction?. The British Accounting Review, 37 (4): pp. 389-413.
Mahoney, T. A., Jerdee, T. H., and Carrol, S. J. (1963). Development of Managerial Performance: a Research Approach. Cincinnati: South western Publishing.
Mahoney, T. A., Jerdee, T. H., and Carrol, S. J. (1965). The job of management. Industrial relation. pp. 97-110.
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. 2d ed. New York: McGraw Hill, Inc.
Simons, R. L. (1995a). Control in an age of empowerment. Harvard Business Review. March-April: pp. 80-88.
Simons, R. L. (1995b). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Simons, R. (2000). Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Subramaniam, N. and Mia, L. (2003). A note on work-related values, budget emphasis and manager’ organizational commitment. Management Accounting Research, 14: pp. 389-408.
Tidd, J. and Bessant, J. (2014). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technology, market and Organizational Change. Fifth Edition. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Ting, H. F., Wang, H. B., and Wang, D. S. (2012). The moderating role of environmental dynamism on the influence of innovation strategy and firm performance. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(5): pp. 517-520.
Uzkurt, C., Kumar, R., Kimzan, H. S., and Eminoglu, G. (2013). Role of innovation in the relationship between organizational culture and firm performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(1): pp. 92 – 117.
Yuliansyah, Y. and Khan, A. (2015). Interactive use of performance measurement systems and the organization’s customers-focused strategy: the mediating role of organizational learning. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 13(2): pp. 219-229.