Cosmopolitan warriors of the keyboard: Cyberbullying as symbolic violent extremism
Main Article Content
Abstract
Cyberbullying is a growing phenomenon worldwide and is perpetrated over a growing range of platforms, devices, and websites (Hanley, 2003). Estimates show that millions of people have been victims of cyberbullying (Laer, 2014). Cyberbullying can be defined differently across cultures and individuals (Cross Tab Marketing Services & Telecommunications Research Group For Microsoft Corporation, 2012). Formally, Microsoft defines it as “willful and repeated harm inflicted through the use of computers, cell phones, and other electronic devices†(Cyberbully Research Center, 2012). Cyberbullying has been on the rise in Malaysia as well as in the world. Malaysia is ranked the 17th highest in online bullying among the 25 countries surveyed by Microsoft.
How is cyberbullying perpetrated? What are the common attributes that lead to one being marked as a target for cyberbullying, given the anonymity of internet users? Why do certain individuals become targets of hate online? Most of the literature has identified forms of cyberbullying, the reasons for it, and how to overcome it, but none have explained the concept of cyberbullying in a way that parallels physical bullying.
I attempt to flesh out the reasons for cyberbullying by imagining the site of interaction as a “field†of activity within Bourdieu’s “theory of practice†paradigm. By doing so, it is hoped that the picture becomes clearer, in the way one might be able to identify a bully in a playground. Drawing upon the context of increased reports of bullying among the youth in Malaysia, this paper provides a literature review of cyberbullying in Malaysia, comparing these to the larger bulk of research on cyberbullying elsewhere around the world. It is hoped that by doing so, it will provide a better understanding of the ways to avoid bullying, as well as explaining the trend of extremist behaviour among Malaysian youth in general.
Thus, the method used for this paper is a literature review. The search for literature on cyberbullying was performed using Google Scholar. Cyberbullying was found to be a relatively recent phenomenon, thus most of the literature does not date back very far. My review thus included most of the existing studies on cyberbullying in Malaysia, comparing these to the larger bulk of research on cyberbullying elsewhere around the world. A pattern that I noticed was that most of these studies were conducted using an information technology or psychology paradigm. I thus aim to contribute to this corpus of work through the sociological paradigm, applying Bourdieu's framework of capital to explain the phenomenon.
Bourdieu conceptualised the “field†as an arena in which a game takes place between its players (Harrington et al., 2015). In the case of cyberbullying, the “field†is the type of Internet platform where the victim and bully interact, for example, social media such as Facebook. The victim, the bully, and the other individuals are competing for resources or “capital†which in this case is popularity. The “rules of the game†would be the internal logic of how the meme operates, as well as how to get more Facebook “likesâ€. Bullying, or “symbolic violenceâ€, comes into the picture when “dominance†occurs. “Dominance†is the use of power over others to make them do something against their will. It is observed that the “doxa†(knowledge of how to use the formal rules to one’s advantage) that Internet users should best employ is the one that minimises personal information as much as possible, to avoid becoming a cyberbully victim.
In conclusion, the forms of cultural capital that may be relevant to competition in the offline “field†do not provide advantage in the virtual “fieldâ€. The most useful cultural capital is that of anonymity. In other words, an invisible “keyboard warrior†is an invincible “keyboard warriorâ€.
Article Details
References
Azlin, N., & Yasin, M. (2018). The Evolution of Online Extremism in Malaysia, 9(7).
Balakrishnan, V. (2015). Cyberbullying among young adults in Malaysia: The roles of gender, age and Internet frequency. Computers in Human Behavior 46, 149-157.
Bourdieu, P. (1979). Symbolic power. Critique of Anthropology, 4(13–14), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X7900401307
Buchanan, T., Paine, C., & Joinson, A. N. (2007). Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet. Journal of the American Society for Information, Science and Technology, 58(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
Chan, R. S. K. (2017). Game of Translations: Virtual Community doing English Translations of Chinese Online Fiction. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 9(1), 39-55.
Chan, R.S.K. (2017). Ah Beng Subculture and the Anti-Capital of Social Exclusion. Bangi: Institute of Ethnic Studies.
Cross Tab Marketing Services & Telecommunications Research Group For Microsoft Corporation. (2012). Online Bullying Among Youth 8-17 Years Old - Worldwide. Microsoft, 1–2. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30148
Cyberbullying Research Center (2012). Peer influence and social norming. http://cyberbullying.org/peer-influences-and-social-norming
Davison, P. (2012). The language of internet memes. The Social Media Reader. Ed. Mandiberg, M. New York: NYU Press.
Del RÃo, J., Sádaba, C. & Bringué, X. (2010). Menores y redes ¿sociales? De la amistad al cyberbullying. Revista de Estudios de Juventud 88, 115–129. http://www.injuve.es/ sites/default/files/RJ88-09.pdf.
DiGi & CyberSecurity Malaysia. (2013). A National Survey Report 2013 Safety Net: Growing Awareness among Malaysian School Children on Staying Safe Online.
Dinakar, K. (2011). Modeling the detection of textual cyberbullying, The Social Mobile Web, 11(02), 11-17.
Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
Gal, N., Shifman, L., & Kampf, Z. (2015). “It Gets Betterâ€: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1698-1714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814568784
Hanley, J. A. (2003). FOSI report: cyberbullying – a global concern. Human Rights, 7.
Harrington, S., Warren, S., & Rayner, C. (2015). Human Resource Management practitioners’ responses to workplace bullying: Cycles of symbolic violence. Organization, 22(3), 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413516175
Hawdon, J. (2016). Exposure to online hate in four nations: a cross-national exposure to online hate in four nations: a cross-national consideration. Deviant Behavior, 38(3), 254-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1196985
Hogg, M. A. (2014). From uncertainty to extremism: social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414540168
Ivanou, U. (2017). Stereotyping Vulnerable Groups. Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Eds. Assimakopoulos, S., Baider, F. H., & Millar, S. ESpringer. SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5, 29-32.
Juliens, C. (2014). Bourdieu, social capital, and online interaction. Sociology, 49(2), 356-373.
Kelly, D. M., & Arnold, C. (2015). Cyberbullying and internet safety. Handbook of Research on the Societal Impact of Digital Media, 529–559. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8310-5.ch021
Klausen, J., Marks, C., & Zaman, T. (2016). Finding Online Extremists in Social Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.06242.
Laer, V. (2014). Social media users won’t fight cyberbullying until they imagine what it’s like to be bullied. The Conversation.
Lai, C. S., Mohamad, M. M., Lee, M. F., Salleh, K. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Rosli, D. I., & Chang, W. V. S. (2017). Prevalence of cyberbullying among students in Malaysian higher learning institutions. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 781–784. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7492
Lawrence, F. (2016). The revolutionary impact of mobile online communications on workplace behaviours and culture. Disability Employment Australia.
López, C.A. & López, R.M. (2017). Hate speech, cyberbullying and online anonymity. Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Eds. Assimakopoulos, S., Baider, F. H., & Millar, S. ESpringer. SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5 General, 80-85.
CyberSecurity Malaysia. (2014). Safeguard Children from Cyberbullying. http://cybersecurity.my/data/content_files/11/1239.pdf?.diff=1393218174
Milner, R. M. (2013). Hacking the social: Internet memes, identity antagonism, and the logic of lulz. The Fibreculture Journal (22), 62–92.
Ng, C.G., Sharmilla Kanagasundram, Yee, H.A., Tan, L.H., Teoh, K.M. (2016). Cyberbullying - a new social menace. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry, 17 (1), XX-XX.
Papacharissi, Z. (2012). Without you, I’m nothing: performances of the self on Twitter. International Journal of Communication, 6(18), 1989–2006.
Shukor, S. A., Abd, H., Shah, R., & Musa, N. A. (2017). Regulating children’s safety on the internet: a malaysian perspective. International Journal for Studies on Children, Women, Elderly And Disabled, 1(January), 1, 152–156.
Singhal, P., & Bansal, A. (2013). Improved textual cyberbullying detection using data mining. International Journal of Information and Computation Technology, 3(6), 569-576.
Vladescu, A. (2018). Social media interactions and the expression of extremist beliefs. Case study: Cyberbullying in the Romanian virtual environment. International Conference RC1C'18 Redefining community in intercultural context, Bucharest, Romania. 17–19 May 2018.
Wacquant, L., & Deyanov, I. (2002). Taking Bourdieu into the field. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 46, 180-186.
Walrave, M., Utz, S., Schouten, A. P., & Heirman, W. (2016). Editorial: The state of online self-disclosure in an era of commodified privacy, Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 10(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2016-1-1
Wan P.M., Zhao W.J., Mohamad A.H. (2017). Cyberbullying experiences and reactions among university students in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Business Humanities and Education 2(1), 53-73.
Weininger, E. B. (2002). Pierre Bourdieu on social class and symbolic violence. Alternative foundations of class analysis, 4, 83.