Student Engagement in Hair Style Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the student engagement in hair style learning. The sample of this research was 90 students taking hair style learning in the Cosmetology Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Jakarta. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive. Data collection was carried out by distributing learning engagement questionnaires to students consisting of 4 indicators including: skills, emotional, participation and performance, using a Likert scale. After the data is collected it is processed with SPSS. The results of the study revealed that as many as 47 (52.2%) students had high engagement in hair style learning and 43 (47.8%) students had low engagement in hair style learning.
Article Details
How to Cite
Puspa Arum, A., Ibrahim, N., Solihatin, E. ., & Siang, J. L. (2019). Student Engagement in Hair Style Learning. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 5(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.31580/apss.v5i2.1134
Section
5th ASIA International Conference 2019, Malaysia
References
Harahap, Sartini, dkk. (2008). Tata Kecantikan Rambut Tingkat Trampil. Jakarta: Meutia Cipta Sarana(85).
Kusumawardhani, Reni. (2010). UPDO 24 Simple Hairstyles by Sugimartono. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.(7).
Handelsman et al(2005). A Measure of College Student Engagement, The Journal of
Educational Research, Vol. 98 (3), h. 185.
Reeve, J. (2005). How Teacher Can Promote Student’s Autonomy During Instruction: Lesson
from a Decade of Research. Iowa Educational Research and Evaluation Association,.
Handelsman et al. (2005). A Measure of College Student Engagement. The Journal of
Educational Research, Vol. 98 (3), h. 185.
Lanasa, Cabrera, & Transgurd, (2009).The Construct Validity of Student Engagement: A
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach. Res High Educ, 50, h. 317.
Consuelo B. Sevila, et.all. (1993).Pengantar Metode Penelitian, Diterjemahkan oleh Amiludin Tuwu Jakarta: UI-Press, h. 71.
Wisnijati Basuki Abdulwahab.(2002). Statistika Parametrik dan Non Parametrik untuk Penelitian Jakarta: UNJ, h.2.
Suharsimi Arikunto.1992, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, h. 25.
Kusumawardhani, Reni. (2010). UPDO 24 Simple Hairstyles by Sugimartono. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.(7).
Handelsman et al(2005). A Measure of College Student Engagement, The Journal of
Educational Research, Vol. 98 (3), h. 185.
Reeve, J. (2005). How Teacher Can Promote Student’s Autonomy During Instruction: Lesson
from a Decade of Research. Iowa Educational Research and Evaluation Association,.
Handelsman et al. (2005). A Measure of College Student Engagement. The Journal of
Educational Research, Vol. 98 (3), h. 185.
Lanasa, Cabrera, & Transgurd, (2009).The Construct Validity of Student Engagement: A
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach. Res High Educ, 50, h. 317.
Consuelo B. Sevila, et.all. (1993).Pengantar Metode Penelitian, Diterjemahkan oleh Amiludin Tuwu Jakarta: UI-Press, h. 71.
Wisnijati Basuki Abdulwahab.(2002). Statistika Parametrik dan Non Parametrik untuk Penelitian Jakarta: UNJ, h.2.
Suharsimi Arikunto.1992, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, h. 25.